Brown L D
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1981 Spring;59(2):145-89.
Market approaches based on reformed incentives and newly vigorous competition are increasingly proposed as reliable, preferable alternatives to public regulation in the quest for health care cost containment. Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) are often said to provide both theoretical and empirical support for market approaches and are expected to be important vehicles for the exercise of market forces in a "reformed" health care system. Yet experience in the 1970s with federal efforts to increase the number and enrollment of HMOs suggests that serious problems of organization, expectations, and political interest will arise even in a reformed marketplace.
基于改革后的激励措施和新的激烈竞争的市场方法,越来越多地被提议作为在控制医疗保健成本方面替代公共监管的可靠、更优选择。健康维护组织(HMOs)常被认为为市场方法提供了理论和实证支持,并有望成为在“改革后的”医疗保健系统中发挥市场力量的重要工具。然而,20世纪70年代联邦政府努力增加HMOs数量和参保人数的经验表明,即使在改革后的市场中,也会出现组织、预期和政治利益等严重问题。