Shapiro M
Infect Control. 1982 Jan-Feb;3(1):38-40. doi: 10.1017/s019594170005709x.
Prophylactic use of antimicrobics represents about 30% of total hospital use of these agents. Previous studies in animal models have suggested that timing of such prophylaxis is crucial, to the extent of the existence of a "critical period" for effective administration. This phenomenon has further been shown to exist in man, in numerous double-blind, controlled clinical trials in various types of surgical wounds. On these bases, we introduced new prophylactic protocols in a university hospital, specifically directed at reducing infection in high-risk procedures. Surveillance was conducted by infection control nurses, and one antibiotic-day was the comparative unit. Infection rates were markedly diminished under these new protocols. Total usage of antimicrobial drugs also decreased by 38% over previous rates. The rationale for limiting prophylaxis to a circumscribed period was clearly demonstrated, although the exact mechanisms responsible for this effect are, as yet, unclear.
预防性使用抗菌药物约占医院这些药物总使用量的30%。先前在动物模型中的研究表明,这种预防的时机至关重要,有效给药存在“关键期”。在各类手术伤口的众多双盲对照临床试验中,这一现象在人体中也得到了进一步证实。基于这些情况,我们在一家大学医院引入了新的预防方案,特别针对降低高风险手术中的感染。由感染控制护士进行监测,以一个抗生素日作为比较单位。在这些新方案下,感染率显著降低。抗菌药物的总使用量也比之前的用量减少了38%。尽管造成这种效果的确切机制尚不清楚,但将预防限制在特定时间段的基本原理已得到明确证明。