Hilton B A
J Adv Nurs. 1982 Nov;7(6):509-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1982.tb00271.x.
This descriptive study attempts to identify the ways Registered Nurses (RNs) perform and interpret diabetic urine testing and capillary blood glucose monitoring measures. Seventy per cent of the RNs from one acute care hospital participated in the study. Seventy-six nurses participated; five of these comprising the pilot study. It was concluded that RNs did not perform these tests accurately according to standards. Knowledge of specimen collection procedures and drugs which affect urine testing results was not consistently high. RNs perceived the definitions of hypoglycaemia, normoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia more widely than standard ranges thus having major implications for patient care. RNs' experience with tests is not necessarily related to the accurate completion of the tests. Implications, limitations and idiosyncrasies of each test should be taught in addition to procedural specifics so that nurses can make sound judgements for patient care.
这项描述性研究试图确定注册护士(RN)进行和解读糖尿病尿液检测及毛细血管血糖监测措施的方式。来自一家急症护理医院的70%的注册护士参与了该研究。76名护士参与其中,其中5名参与了初步研究。研究得出结论,注册护士并未按照标准准确进行这些检测。对标本采集程序和影响尿液检测结果的药物的了解程度并非始终很高。注册护士对低血糖、血糖正常和高血糖的定义的理解比标准范围更宽泛,因此对患者护理有重大影响。注册护士的检测经验不一定与检测的准确完成相关。除了程序细节外,还应教授每项检测的影响、局限性和特殊性,以便护士能够为患者护理做出合理判断。