Sloan J L, Marcus L
J Autism Dev Disord. 1981 Jun;11(2):191-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01531684.
Two studies on the use of the AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale (ABS) with autistic children are reported. The first study compared ratings by parents and teachers on the same child. For Part I (Adaptive), significant correlations were found on total score and on 7 out of 10 individual scales. For Part II (Behavior), significant correlations were found on only 3 out of 14 scales and not on total score. The second study examined change measured by the ABS across an academic year. For Part I, significant change occurred on 5 of the 10 scales and on total score; for Part II significant differences were found on 2 of the 14 scales and not on total score. Correlations with IQ, Social Quotient (SQ), and degree of autism revealed a similar pattern. The implications of the differences between the two parts of the ABS and their utility for autistic children are discussed.
本文报告了两项关于对自闭症儿童使用美国智力缺陷协会适应性行为量表(ABS)的研究。第一项研究比较了家长和教师对同一儿童的评分。对于第一部分(适应性),在总分以及10个单项量表中的7个量表上发现了显著相关性。对于第二部分(行为),仅在14个量表中的3个量表上发现了显著相关性,而在总分上未发现显著相关性。第二项研究考察了整个学年中ABS所测得的变化。对于第一部分,10个量表中的5个量表以及总分出现了显著变化;对于第二部分,在14个量表中的2个量表上发现了显著差异,而在总分上未发现显著差异。与智商、社会商数(SQ)以及自闭症程度的相关性呈现出类似的模式。本文讨论了ABS两部分之间差异的意义及其对自闭症儿童的效用。