Suppr超能文献

CES-D量表在不同种族背景下的信度。

Reliability of the CES-D Scale in different ethnic contexts.

作者信息

Roberts R E

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 1980 May;2(2):125-34. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(80)90069-4.

Abstract

Reliability of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, a 20-item symptom checklist, is examined using data from a sample of community respondents containing Anglos (254), Blacks (270), and Mexican Americans (181). Although the survey response rate was lower for Mexican Americans, quality of the data provided by this group was not significantly different from that for Anglos or Blacks. That is, there were no differences among these groups in terms of missing data or internal consistency reliabilty (as measured by Cronbach's alpha and Spearman-Brown split halves). Factor-analytic results also demonstrate the same general structure of responses among the three groups.

摘要

使用来自包含盎格鲁人(254人)、黑人(270人)和墨西哥裔美国人(181人)的社区受访者样本的数据,对包含20个项目的症状清单——流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的信度进行了检验。尽管墨西哥裔美国人的调查回复率较低,但该群体提供的数据质量与盎格鲁人或黑人的数据质量并无显著差异。也就是说,这些群体在缺失数据或内部一致性信度方面(通过克朗巴赫α系数和斯皮尔曼 - 布朗分半法测量)没有差异。因子分析结果也表明这三组的反应具有相同的总体结构。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验