• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)前列腺癌治疗方案。中期报告。

EORTC protocols in prostatic cancer. An interim report.

作者信息

Pavone-Macaluso M, Lund F, Mulder J H, Smith P H, De Pauw M, Sylvester R

出版信息

Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1980;55:163-8.

PMID:6938020
Abstract

Two parallel prospective randomized studies have been undertaken by the EORTC Urological Group in previously untreated patients with prostatic cancer in order to compare low dose Stilboestrol versus Cyproterone acetate versus Medroxyprogesterone acetate in the first trial, and Stilboestrol versus Estracyt in the second trial. Although the follow up is still short, no superiority of the other drugs over Stilboestrol had appeared so far with regard to either objective response or significant side effects apart from gynaecomastia. In the third trial, patients with advanced disease no longer responsive to hormonal treatment were randomized to either Adriamycin or Procarbazine. Toxicity and early death were particularly frequent in Procarbazine treated patients, whereas most patients progressed in both treatment groups.

摘要

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织泌尿学小组针对既往未接受过治疗的前列腺癌患者开展了两项平行的前瞻性随机研究。在第一项试验中,比较低剂量己烯雌酚、醋酸环丙孕酮和醋酸甲羟孕酮;在第二项试验中,比较己烯雌酚和癌腺治。尽管随访时间仍较短,但就客观反应或除乳腺增生外的显著副作用而言,目前尚未发现其他药物优于己烯雌酚。在第三项试验中,对激素治疗不再有反应的晚期疾病患者被随机分为接受阿霉素或丙卡巴肼治疗。丙卡巴肼治疗的患者毒性反应和早期死亡尤为常见,而两个治疗组的大多数患者病情都出现了进展。

相似文献

1
EORTC protocols in prostatic cancer. An interim report.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)前列腺癌治疗方案。中期报告。
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1980;55:163-8.
2
EORTC protocol 30761: a randomized study of non-metastatic and metastatic prostatic cancer treated by cyproterone acetate versus diethylstilbestrol and medroxyprogesterone acetate. European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Urological Group.
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1989;303:111-6.
3
Treatment of prostatic cancer: the EORTC experience--preliminary results of prostatic carcinoma trials.前列腺癌的治疗:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的经验——前列腺癌试验的初步结果
Prostate. 1984;5(2):193-8. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990050208.
4
Results of a Dutch trial with the LHRH agonist buserelin in patients with metastatic prostatic cancer and results of EORTC studies in prostatic cancer.
Am J Clin Oncol. 1988;11 Suppl 1:S33-5.
5
Cyproterone acetate versus medroxyprogesterone acetate versus diethylstilbestrol in the treatment of prostate cancer: results from EORTC Study 30761.醋酸环丙孕酮对比醋酸甲羟孕酮对比己烯雌酚治疗前列腺癌:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织30761研究结果
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1987;243A:379-82.
6
[Treatment of prostatic cancer: medroxyprogesterone acetate, diethylstilbestrol and cyproterone acetate. Provisional report of a random study by the genito-urinary cooperative group of the EORTC].[前列腺癌的治疗:醋酸甲羟孕酮、己烯雌酚和醋酸环丙孕酮。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织泌尿生殖协作组随机研究的初步报告]
Arch Esp Urol. 1982 Sep-Oct;35(5):304-11.
7
The EORTC Phase III trials in prostatic cancer.
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;185A:243-9.
8
Lessons from phase III-trials on the hormonal treatment of prostatic cancer. I: Results of EORTC-trials 30761 and 30762.前列腺癌激素治疗的III期试验经验。I:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)试验30761和30762的结果。
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988;260:111-7.
9
EORTC protocol 30805: a phase III trial comparing orchidectomy versus orchidectomy and cyproterone acetate and low dose stilboestrol in the management of metastatic carcinoma of the prostate.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)30805号方案:一项III期试验,比较睾丸切除术与睾丸切除术加醋酸环丙孕酮和低剂量己烯雌酚治疗前列腺转移性癌的疗效。
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988;260:101-10.
10
Comparison of diethylstilbestrol, cyproterone acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer: final analysis of a randomized phase III trial of the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Urological Group.己烯雌酚、醋酸环丙孕酮和醋酸甲羟孕酮治疗晚期前列腺癌的比较:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织泌尿学组一项随机III期试验的最终分析
J Urol. 1986 Sep;136(3):624-31. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44996-2.