Murray G A, Yates J L, Newman S M
J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Aug;46(2):167-70. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(81)90302-4.
In a comparison of the UV light--activated composite resins, Estilux was polymerized to a significantly greater depth than the other composite resins. In general, Lee-fill polymerized the least. When comparing the UV light sources, the Lee light and the Duralux light did not significantly differ from each other, but both polymerized the materials tested to a significantly greater depth than the other light sources. Of the two time exposures, 60-second exposure provided a significantly greater depth of polymerization than 20 seconds for each light with each material.
在紫外线激活复合树脂的比较中，Estilux的聚合深度明显大于其他复合树脂。总体而言，Lee-fill的聚合程度最低。在比较紫外线光源时，Lee光和Duralux光彼此之间没有显著差异，但两者都使测试材料的聚合深度明显大于其他光源。在两种曝光时间中，对于每种光源和每种材料，60秒曝光提供的聚合深度明显大于20秒曝光。
