Djupesland G, Flottorp G, Modalsli B, Tvete O, Sortland O
Scand Audiol Suppl. 1981;13:109-12.
The aim of the present investigation is to throw light upon the following question: Is recording of click-evoked brain stem responses (ABR) a more sensitive and reliable test than the oto-neurological and conventional audiological tests in selecting patients for computerized tomography (CT)? Thirty-three patients were examined. They all presented case histories and otoneurological findings indicating a tumor in te cerebellopontine angle. In all cases CT was carried out. A tumor was found in 16 patients, normal findings in 17. The results obtained by audiological and oto-neurological tests were compared to those obtained by ABR recording. It is concluded that recording of ABR and the caloric vestibular test are the most reliable examinations in selecting patients for CT. These examinations alone, are, however, not sufficient to secure a completely reliable selection, and should be supplemented by other audiological tests.
在为计算机断层扫描(CT)选择患者时,记录点击诱发的脑干反应(ABR)是否比耳神经学和传统听力测试更敏感、更可靠?对33名患者进行了检查。他们都有病史和耳神经学检查结果,表明存在桥小脑角肿瘤。所有病例均进行了CT检查。16例患者发现肿瘤,17例结果正常。将听力测试和耳神经学测试的结果与ABR记录的结果进行了比较。得出的结论是,记录ABR和冷热前庭试验是为CT选择患者时最可靠的检查。然而,仅这些检查不足以确保完全可靠的选择,还应辅以其他听力测试。