Anderson J, Krivit W, Chilcote R, Pyesmany A, Chard R, Hammond D
Cancer Treat Rep. 1981 Nov-Dec;65(11-12):1015-9.
One hundred and seventy-nine previously treated children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relapse considered not "resistant" to vincristine (VCR) were randomly allocated to receive reinduction therapy with either vindesine (VND) or VCR, in combination with prednisone and L-asparaginase. Complete remission rates were 57% for both regimens and were significantly greater for first relapsers (69%) than for subsequent relapsers (43%). No significant difference in response rates by regimen was observed within relapse groups. Patients treated with VND experienced significantly greater hematologic toxicity. These data suggest that there is no advantage to using VND instead of VCR in standard reinduction therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relapse.
179名之前接受过治疗、复发时被认为对长春新碱(VCR)“不耐药”的急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童被随机分配,接受长春地辛(VND)或VCR联合泼尼松和L-天冬酰胺酶进行再诱导治疗。两种方案的完全缓解率均为57%,首次复发者(69%)的完全缓解率显著高于后续复发者(43%)。在复发组中,未观察到两种方案的缓解率有显著差异。接受VND治疗的患者血液学毒性显著更大。这些数据表明,在儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病复发的标准再诱导治疗中,使用VND而非VCR并无优势。