Dennison J B, Fan P L, Powers J M
J Am Dent Assoc. 1981 Jun;102(6):859-62. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1981.0215.
Average surface roughness values, profile tracings, and surface microstructures of three microfilled composites and a conventional composite were studied with respect to final finishing procedures. Surfaces cured against Mylar matrix strips were the smoothest and were similar for all composites. White stones produced the roughest surfaces for Isopast, Silar, and Superfil. Silicon carbide disks and aluminum oxide disks produced smoother surfaces. The finished surfaces of the microfilled composites were smoother than the corresponding surfaces of Concise for each finishing instrumentation evaluated.
针对三种微填料复合树脂和一种传统复合树脂，就最终修整程序研究了其平均表面粗糙度值、轮廓曲线和表面微观结构。在聚酯薄膜基质条上固化的表面最光滑，且所有复合树脂的此类表面相似。对于伊斯帕斯特、西拉尔和超级填料复合树脂，白色磨石产生的表面最粗糙。碳化硅盘和氧化铝盘产生的表面更光滑。对于所评估的每种修整器械，微填料复合树脂的修整表面比康赛斯复合树脂的相应表面更光滑。
