Sewerin I
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1981 Apr;9(2):69-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1981.tb01031.x.
4374 proximal surfaces on 791 posterior bitewing radiographs were classified according to overlappings. Six categories were used: 1) no overlapping, 2) blurred contact areas, 3) less than half of the enamel overlapped, 4) more than half of the enamel overlapped, 5) dentin overlapped, and 6) unclassifiable overlappings. Filled surfaces and surfaces not in contact were excluded. Only 19% of the surfaces did not have overlappings 65% exhibited mild overlappings (categories 2 and 3), and 16% severe overlappings (categories 4, 5 and 6). The frequencies of no overlappings varied from 7% to 40% for single tooth surfaces. The relationship between distribution of overlappings and tooth surfaces was statistically significant at the 0.05% level. Principles of excluding overlapping surfaces have been inconsistent in previous epidemiologic studies and clinical trials. The use of exact criteria for exclusion is recommended.
根据重叠情况对791张后牙咬合翼片上的4374个邻面进行了分类。共使用了六种类别:1)无重叠;2)接触区域模糊;3)釉质重叠少于一半;4)釉质重叠超过一半;5)牙本质重叠;6)无法分类的重叠。填充面和未接触的面被排除在外。只有19%的面没有重叠,65%表现为轻度重叠(类别2和3),16%表现为重度重叠(类别4、5和6)。单颗牙齿表面无重叠的频率在7%至40%之间变化。重叠分布与牙齿表面之间的关系在0.05%水平上具有统计学意义。在以往的流行病学研究和临床试验中,排除重叠表面的原则一直不一致。建议使用确切的排除标准。