Suppr超能文献

下颌传导阻滞镇痛。Fischer法与Gow-Gates法的比较研究。

Conduction block analgesia in the mandible. A comparative investigation of the techniques of Fischer and Gow-Gates.

作者信息

Agren E, Danielsson K

出版信息

Swed Dent J. 1981;5(3):81-9.

PMID:6947470
Abstract

An investigation has been made in order to compare two different intraoral methods for mandibular block analgesia. The first method (according to Fischer) anesthetizes the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves just above the level of the mandibular foramen and the other method (according to Gow-Gates) anesthetizes the mandibular nerve just after leaving the oval foramen. The latter method should, with only one injection, give complete analgesia within the entire distribution zone of the sensory components of the mandibular nerve. The investigation has been performed on 12 test subjects, who each have achieved mandibular block analgesia according to the two methods mentioned above. 1.8 ml lidocaine-adrenaline (20 mg per ml + 12.5 microgram per ml) has been used and the analgesic effect has been tested in the pulps and in the vestibular and lingual mucosa at different time intervals. The investigation shows that the onset of analgesia and complete analgesia was more rapid with the first method than with Gow-Gates' method. Furthermore Gow-Gates' method shows no superiority in anesthetizing the long buccal nerve without separate injection for this nerve. However, regarding the analgesic effect only, there has been no statistically significant difference between the two methods with this small number of test subjects.

摘要

为比较两种不同的下颌阻滞镇痛口腔内方法进行了一项研究。第一种方法(根据菲舍尔)在下颌孔水平上方麻醉下牙槽神经和舌神经,另一种方法(根据高-盖茨)在其刚离开卵圆孔后麻醉下颌神经。后一种方法仅通过一次注射,应能在下颌神经感觉成分的整个分布区内产生完全镇痛效果。该研究对12名受试者进行,他们每人都按照上述两种方法实现了下颌阻滞镇痛。使用了1.8毫升利多卡因-肾上腺素(每毫升20毫克+每毫升12.5微克),并在不同时间间隔对牙髓以及前庭和舌黏膜的镇痛效果进行了测试。研究表明,第一种方法的镇痛起效和完全镇痛比高-盖茨方法更快。此外,在不单独注射长颊神经的情况下,高-盖茨方法在麻醉长颊神经方面并无优势。然而,仅就镇痛效果而言,在这少量受试者中两种方法之间没有统计学上的显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验