Nelson F L, Farberow N L, MacKinnon D R
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1978 Summer;8(2):75-88.
From Durkheim's time to the present social researchers interested in the problem of suicide have relied upon officially reported rates of suicide to develop and test their theories. Despite the fact that the validity of any theory rests upon the accuracy of its underlying data, the relative accuracy of reported suicide rates have rarely been questioned or systematically evaluated. This paper investigates the process of death certification as practiced by a sample of 191 coroners in 11 western states. Findings indicate extensive variation in the backgrounds, professional resources, operating procedures, and governing statutes of coroners and coroners' offices and in policies concerning the use of the suicide mode. Since the coroner is generally charged with the official responsibility for certifying the mode of death when unnatural mode is suspect, the extent of variation found here calls into question the validity and comparability of reported suicide rates.
从涂尔干时代至今,关注自杀问题的社会研究者一直依赖官方报告的自杀率来发展和检验他们的理论。尽管任何理论的有效性都取决于其基础数据的准确性,但报告的自杀率的相对准确性很少受到质疑或得到系统评估。本文调查了西部11个州191名验尸官样本的死亡证明过程。研究结果表明,验尸官和验尸官办公室的背景、专业资源、操作程序、管理法规以及关于自杀方式使用的政策存在广泛差异。由于当怀疑是非自然死亡方式时,验尸官通常负有官方责任来证明死亡方式,这里发现的差异程度让人质疑报告的自杀率的有效性和可比性。