Lui J L, Low T
J Oral Rehabil. 1982 Jan;9(1):67-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1982.tb00536.x.
Surface smoothness is an important requirement for restorative materials. Recently, restorative materials claimed to be inherently smooth in surface characteristics have been developed. Matrix-formed and finished surfaces of five new microfill restorative materials were compared with two composite resins, an acrylic resin and a silicate cement by means of scanning electron microscopy. The results of this investigation indicated that the matrix-formed surfaces of all the restorative materials studied were not altogether perfect. Polishing using sandpaper and cuttlefish discs produced a very smooth surface finish in the new microfill restorative materials, Estic microfill, Estilux microfill, Isopast, Isolux and Silar which was comparable to that of the acrylic resin, Sevriton. The composite resins, Adaptic and Estilux exhibited the worst surface finish and the silicate cement, Bio-trey was intermediate. Finishing, using other finer polishing devices on four of the materials produced a further improvement in the surface finish.
表面光滑度是修复材料的一项重要要求。近来,已开发出表面特性据称本质上就很光滑的修复材料。借助扫描电子显微镜,将五种新型微填料修复材料的基质形成表面和精加工表面与两种复合树脂、一种丙烯酸树脂和一种硅酸盐水泥进行了比较。这项研究的结果表明,所研究的所有修复材料的基质形成表面并非完全完美。使用砂纸和乌贼骨盘进行抛光,在新型微填料修复材料Estic微填料、Estilux微填料、Isopast、Isolux和Silar中产生了非常光滑的表面光洁度,这与丙烯酸树脂Sevriton的表面光洁度相当。复合树脂Adaptic和Estilux的表面光洁度最差,而硅酸盐水泥Bio-trey则处于中间水平。对其中四种材料使用其他更精细的抛光设备进行精加工,进一步改善了表面光洁度。