Järvinen S
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1981 Dec;9(6):285-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1981.tb00347.x.
The need for interceptive intervention for malocclusion was studied in a sample of 839 Finnish children aged 6 years. The children had participated in an organized preventive orthodontic program, and nearly 10% of them had received preventive or interceptive orthodontic treatment at the age of 3-5 years (stage I of the preventive orthodontic program of the author). Orthodontic intervention was estimated to be needed for 5.9% of the children due to crossbite of the permanent central incisors, to crossbite or scissors-bite of the permanent first molars, to ectopic eruption of the permanent first molars, to numerical variation of the permanent incisors, or to functional open bite. The need for further inspection in order to follow-up development of the dentition was noted in 2.7% of the children. The indications occasioning this consideration were initial severe crowding, extreme incisal overjet, and early loss of the primary mandibular canines. The relatively low prevalence rates seemed to indicate advantageous results of the preventive and interceptive orthodontic measures.
在一个由839名6岁芬兰儿童组成的样本中,研究了对牙颌面畸形进行阻断性干预的必要性。这些儿童参加了一个有组织的预防性正畸项目,其中近10%的儿童在3至5岁时(作者预防性正畸项目的第一阶段)接受了预防性或阻断性正畸治疗。估计有5.9%的儿童因恒牙中切牙反合、恒牙第一磨牙反合或剪刀合、恒牙第一磨牙异位萌出、恒牙切牙数量变异或功能性开牙合而需要正畸干预。2.7%的儿童需要进一步检查以跟踪牙列发育情况。引起这种考虑的指征是初始严重拥挤、极度切牙覆盖、乳牙下颌尖牙过早缺失。相对较低的患病率似乎表明预防性和阻断性正畸措施取得了有利结果。