Lamberts D M, Wunderlich R C, Caffesse R G
J Periodontol. 1982 Jun;53(6):393-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1982.53.6.393.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of waxed and unwaxed floss in plaque removal and on gingival health when used in a home oral hygiene program. Eighty patients, having previously received periodontal therapy, were divided into four similar groups, according to the S-OHI. Each group represented four different types of dental floss being tested: Butler waxed, Butler unwaxed, Johnson and Johnson waxed, and Johnson and Johnson unwaxed. After receiving a thorough prophylaxis, each patient received oral hygiene instruction with a video tape, and was given a toothbrush and a quantity of test floss. At 0, 28 and 56 day intervals, The patients were scored for plaque and gingivitis. The data were then analyzed statistically using analysis of variance. It was found that there was no statistical difference among the four different types of tested floss as far as their plaque removal ability or prevention of gingivitis is concerned.
本研究的目的是确定在家庭口腔卫生计划中使用有蜡牙线和无蜡牙线在去除牙菌斑以及对牙龈健康方面的效果。80名先前接受过牙周治疗的患者,根据简化口腔卫生指数(S-OHI)被分为四个相似的组。每组代表四种不同类型的正在测试的牙线:巴特勒有蜡牙线、巴特勒无蜡牙线、强生有蜡牙线和强生无蜡牙线。在接受全面的洁治后,每位患者通过录像带接受口腔卫生指导,并得到一支牙刷和一定量的测试牙线。在间隔0、28和56天时,对患者的牙菌斑和牙龈炎情况进行评分。然后使用方差分析对数据进行统计学分析。结果发现,就四种不同类型测试牙线的牙菌斑清除能力或预防牙龈炎的能力而言,不存在统计学差异。