Sullivan M P, Chen T, Dyment P G, Hvizdala E, Steuber C P
Blood. 1982 Oct;60(4):948-58.
The efficacy of intrathecal (i.t.) chemoprophylaxis was compared with cranial radiotherapy plus i.t. methotrexate (MTX) in a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study accessing 408 patients from September 10, 1974, to October 29, 1976. Randomization was stratified by prognostic groups (PGs) based on age and white blood cell count at diagnosis. All received induction therapy with vincristine and prednisone (Pred); maintenance therapy consisted of daily 6-mercaptopurine and weekly MTX. Consolidation for arm 1 employed cyclophosphamide and L-asparaginase followed by biweekly 5-day courses of parenteral MTX. The first dose of each course of MTX was given i.t. in triple chemoprophylaxis (MTX, hydrocortisone, and cytosine arabinoside). During maintenance, i.t. chemoprophylaxis was bimonthly and 28-day Pred "pulses" were given every 3 mo. Arm 2 i.t. chemoprophylaxis was initiated on achievement of remission, and arm 3 i.t. on treatment day 1; both continued 1 yr. Arm 4 induction included two doses of L-asparaginase. On achievement of remission, CNS prophylaxis (radiotherapy, 2400 rad plus i.t. MTX) was given. For all, therapy was discontinued after 3 yr of continuous complete remission. Survival and the incidence of extramedullary relapse were similar for the treatments employing either i.t. chemoprophylaxis or radiotherapy plus i.t. MTX upon achievement of remission. Among poor prognosis patients, the duration of complete remission was significantly better with the regimen using i.t. chemoprophylaxis as a component of consolidation therapy than with the regimen employing i.t. chemoprophylaxis early in induction or with the treatment using radiotherapy plus i.t. MTX for CNS prophylaxis. In poor prognosis patients, the initiation of i.t. chemoprophylaxis during consolidation was also associated with hematologic remissions that were significantly better than those achieved with the treatment employing early CNS chemoprophylaxis or with the regimen using radiotherapy plus i.t. MTX. Among average prognosis patients, therapy with CNS chemoprophylaxis during consolidation, as well as the regimen employing radiotherapy and i.t. MTX for CNS prophylaxis, produced hematologic remissions that were significantly longer than those obtained with the regimen using early CNS chemoprophylaxis. Hematologic remissions of good prognosis patients who received treatment with the regimen employing i.t. chemoprophylaxis during consolidation were statistically superior when compared to the regimen employing CNS radiotherapy plus i.t. MTX. This study indicates that i.t. chemoprophylaxis may be substituted for cranial radiotherapy when utilizing effective systemic regimens. Additionally, chemoprophylaxis may be reduced from 3 to 1 yr in patients with good prognostic factors.
在西南肿瘤协作组(SWOG)的一项研究中,对鞘内化疗预防与颅脑放疗加鞘内甲氨蝶呤(MTX)的疗效进行了比较。该研究纳入了1974年9月10日至1976年10月29日期间的408例患者。根据诊断时的年龄和白细胞计数,将随机分组按预后组(PGs)进行分层。所有患者均接受长春新碱和泼尼松(Pred)诱导治疗;维持治疗包括每日服用6-巯基嘌呤和每周服用MTX。第1组的巩固治疗采用环磷酰胺和L-天冬酰胺酶,随后每两周进行为期5天的肠外MTX疗程。MTX每个疗程的第一剂通过三联化疗预防(MTX、氢化可的松和阿糖胞苷)鞘内给药。在维持治疗期间,鞘内化疗预防每两个月进行一次,每3个月给予28天的Pred“脉冲”治疗。第2组在达到缓解时开始鞘内化疗预防,第3组在治疗第1天开始鞘内化疗预防;两者均持续1年。第4组诱导治疗包括两剂L-天冬酰胺酶。达到缓解后,给予中枢神经系统预防(放疗,2400拉德加鞘内MTX)。对于所有患者,在持续完全缓解3年后停止治疗。在达到缓解后,采用鞘内化疗预防或放疗加鞘内MTX治疗的患者的生存率和髓外复发率相似。在预后较差的患者中,与在诱导早期采用鞘内化疗预防的方案或采用放疗加鞘内MTX进行中枢神经系统预防的治疗相比,将鞘内化疗预防作为巩固治疗组成部分的方案的完全缓解持续时间明显更好。在预后较差的患者中,在巩固治疗期间开始鞘内化疗预防也与血液学缓解明显更好有关,这比早期中枢神经系统化疗预防的治疗或放疗加鞘内MTX的方案所达到的缓解更好。在预后中等的患者中,巩固治疗期间进行中枢神经系统化疗预防的治疗以及采用放疗和鞘内MTX进行中枢神经系统预防的方案产生的血液学缓解明显长于早期中枢神经系统化疗预防方案所获得的缓解。与采用中枢神经系统放疗加鞘内MTX的方案相比,接受巩固治疗期间采用鞘内化疗预防方案治疗的预后良好患者的血液学缓解在统计学上更优。这项研究表明,在采用有效的全身治疗方案时,鞘内化疗预防可替代颅脑放疗。此外,对于预后良好的患者,化疗预防时间可从3年减至1年。