Suppr超能文献

少白细胞血液的制备。五种不同方法的比较。

Production of leucocyte poor blood. A comparison of five different methods.

作者信息

Grunnet N, Rasmussen N J

出版信息

Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1981;64:106-11.

PMID:6959257
Abstract

The efficiency of leucocyte removal and the degree of erythrocyte loss were investigated by five different methods. The methods were: 1) saline washing of red blood cells (RBC) in the cell separator, 2) centrifugation of whole blood in glass bottles followed by removal of plasma and buffy coat by suction. 3) Imugard-Terumo filtration of whole blood, 4) inverse centrifugation of blood in a double plastic bag followed by transferring the RBC to the satellite bag, and 5) sedimentation of RBCs in CPD-dextran followed by dripping the RBCs to another glass bottle. Method no. 5 was clearly the most efficient, containing a mean of 20.8% of the offered leucocytes. After washing in saline three times this could be lowered to 7.0%. Method no. 3 was the second best method, having the lowest degree of erythrocyte loss. Methods no. 2 and 4 are approximately of the same quality. However method no. 1 was bad and can not be recommended for production of leucocyte poor blood in the present modification.

摘要

通过五种不同方法研究了白细胞去除效率和红细胞损失程度。这些方法分别是:1)在细胞分离器中用生理盐水洗涤红细胞(RBC);2)在玻璃瓶中对全血进行离心,然后通过抽吸去除血浆和白膜层;3)用Imugard - 泰尔茂过滤器过滤全血;4)在双层塑料袋中对血液进行反向离心,然后将红细胞转移至附属袋;5)在CPD - 右旋糖酐中使红细胞沉降,然后将红细胞滴入另一个玻璃瓶。方法5显然是最有效的,平均含有所提供白细胞的20.8%。用生理盐水洗涤三次后,这一比例可降至7.0%。方法3是第二好的方法,红细胞损失程度最低。方法2和4质量大致相同。然而,方法1效果不佳,在目前的改进中不推荐用于生产低白细胞血液。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验