Brown M L, Wahner H W, Hay I D, Hammell T C, Gray J E
J Nucl Med. 1980 Aug;21(8):729-32.
To evaluate observer performance in adrenal scintigraphy with two different imaging instruments and to assess the requirement for computer processing in routine adrenal imaging, gamma-camera images (analog and computer processed) and Anger tomoscanner studies were independently interpreted by three observers. Thirty-eight pairs of images were used for the analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in comparing the tomoscanner with the large-field gamma camera, and 44 pairs of images were used for the comparison of the gamma camera analog images with computer-processed images. ROC analysis demonstrated a higher detection rate for the tomographic images. The computer-processed images did not improve adrenal detection. When each case was considered individually, the tomoiscanner was preferred in 37% of cases, and in 50% of cases, both instruments were considered to be equaly valuable.
为评估使用两种不同成像设备进行肾上腺闪烁扫描时观察者的表现,并评估常规肾上腺成像中计算机处理的必要性,由三名观察者对γ相机图像(模拟图像和计算机处理图像)及安格断层扫描仪研究结果进行独立解读。在比较断层扫描仪与大视野γ相机时,使用了38对图像来分析受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线;在比较γ相机模拟图像与计算机处理图像时,使用了44对图像。ROC分析表明断层图像的检测率更高。计算机处理图像并未改善肾上腺检测效果。当单独考虑每个病例时,37%的病例更倾向于使用断层扫描仪,50%的病例认为两种设备同样有价值。