Yoshii K, Kobatake Y, Kurihara K
J Gen Physiol. 1981 Apr;77(4):373-85. doi: 10.1085/jgp.77.4.373.
Properties of the receptor sites for L-amino acids in taste cells of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) were examined by measuring the neural activities of the glossopharyngeal nerve under various conditions. (a) The frogs responded to 12 amino acids, but the responses to the amino acids varied with individual frogs under natural conditions. The frog tongues, however, exhibited similar responses after an alkaline treatment that removes Ca2+ from the tissue. The variation in the responses under natural conditions was apparently due to the variation in the amount of Ca2+ bound to the receptor membrane. (b) The responses to hydrophilic L-amino acids (glycine, L-alanine, L-serine, L-threonine, L-cysteine, and L-proline) were of a tonic type, but those to hydrophobic L-amino acids (L-valine, L-leucine, L-isoleucine, L-methionine, L-phenylalanine, and L-tyrptophan) were usually composed of both phasic and tonic components. (c) The properties of the tonic component were quite different from those of the phasic component: the tonic component was largely enhanced by the alkaline treatment and suppressed by the acidic treatment that increases binding of Ca2+ to the tissue. Also, the tonic component was suppressed by the presence of low concentrations of salts, or the action of pronase E, whereas the phasic component was unchanged under these conditions. These properties of the phasic component were quite similar to those of the response to hydrophobic substances such as quinine. These results suggest that the hydrophilic L-amino acids stimulate receptor protein(s) and that the hydrophobic L-amino acids stimulate both the receptor protein and a receptor site similar to that for quinine. (d) On the basis of the suppression of the responses to amino acids by salts, the mechanism of generation of the receptor potential is discussed.
通过在各种条件下测量牛蛙(牛蛙)味觉细胞中L-氨基酸受体位点的特性,研究了舌咽神经的神经活动。(a)青蛙对12种氨基酸有反应,但在自然条件下,不同青蛙对氨基酸的反应各不相同。然而,经过从组织中去除Ca2+的碱性处理后,青蛙舌头表现出相似的反应。自然条件下反应的差异显然是由于与受体膜结合的Ca2+量的变化。(b)对亲水性L-氨基酸(甘氨酸、L-丙氨酸、L-丝氨酸、L-苏氨酸、L-半胱氨酸和L-脯氨酸)的反应是紧张型的,但对疏水性L-氨基酸(L-缬氨酸、L-亮氨酸、L-异亮氨酸、L-甲硫氨酸、L-苯丙氨酸和L-色氨酸)的反应通常由相位和紧张成分组成。(c)紧张成分的特性与相位成分的特性有很大不同:碱性处理大大增强了紧张成分,而增加Ca2+与组织结合的酸性处理则抑制了紧张成分。此外,低浓度盐的存在或链霉蛋白酶E的作用会抑制紧张成分,而在这些条件下相位成分不变。相位成分的这些特性与对奎宁等疏水性物质的反应非常相似。这些结果表明,亲水性L-氨基酸刺激受体蛋白,而疏水性L-氨基酸既刺激受体蛋白,也刺激类似于奎宁的受体位点。(d)基于盐对氨基酸反应的抑制作用,讨论了受体电位的产生机制。