Bernau A, Kruppa G
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1981 Feb;119(1):126-37. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1051434.
In a prospective study 1200 sequences of low frequency electrostimulation and ultrasonic therapy have been examined. The basics of the type of currents applied, the therapy scheme and the indication routine are presented. These parameters were kept constant in the course of the 2 years' study. For the treatment 8 different apparatuses were available. The actual current shapes of the generators were measured, the influence of constant-current and constant-voltage output circuits were tested and were discussed in relation to the electrode types.--Advantages and disadvantages of disposable-type, sponge-type, lead-type and vacuum-type electrodes are reported. Treatments were carried out with the current types DF and CP of the diadynamic currents alone, as combined therapy together with ultrasound, as mere ultrasound treatment, as ultrastimulation current, as iontophoresis and galvanic current. The results are compared with comparable examinations by other authors and they are discussed with respect to different influencing factors.
在一项前瞻性研究中，对1200例低频电刺激和超声治疗序列进行了检查。介绍了所应用电流类型、治疗方案和适应症常规的基础内容。在为期2年的研究过程中，这些参数保持不变。治疗使用了8种不同的仪器。测量了发生器的实际电流波形，测试了恒流和恒压输出电路的影响，并结合电极类型进行了讨论。报告了一次性型、海绵型、铅型和真空型电极的优缺点。治疗分别采用了单独的动态干扰电流的DF和CP电流类型、与超声联合治疗、单纯超声治疗、超声刺激电流、离子导入和直流电。将结果与其他作者的类似检查进行了比较，并就不同的影响因素进行了讨论。
