Sheers G, Rossiter C E, Gilson J C, Mackenzie F A
Br J Ind Med. 1978 Aug;35(3):195-203. doi: 10.1136/oem.35.3.195.
ABSTRACT In a survey of the effects of exposure to asbestos in the UK Naval Dockyards, small- and large-film chest radiographs of 674 men have been examined. These films have been read under survey conditions by two readers using a simple screening classification, and also in a controlled trial by five readers using the full ILO U/C classification. Comparison between the reading methods showed a deficiency, independent of the size of film, of at least 30% in the detection of asbestos-related radiographic abnormalities when the screening classification was used. For adequate diagnostic sensitivity the ILO U/C classification appears to be essential. There was a deficiency of 43% in significant abnormalities observed by a majority of readers in the small films when directly compared with large film readings. This deficiency could be reduced to 7% by using readings of the small films at any level of abnormality by any of the five readers. When the ILO U/C readings were related to the clinical diagnoses, the only abnormality missed was a small pleural plaque. Films with previously agreed coding were inserted at intervals during the reading trial and helped to maintain the consistency of reading. Right oblique views were taken for 1884 men, in addition to the full-sized postero-anterior view, but the contribution provided by this view proved insufficient to justify its use in large surveys. The cost of a survey when small films are used as a screening method is reduced to between one-third and one-half of the cost when large films are used, assuming that the abnormality rate is not more than 5%. However, this cost advantage for small films is likely to be overtaken by the development of automatic large-film units. The radiation dose when small films are used is increased by a factor of about 20, but is within the prescribed safety level. It is concluded that at least three readers should be involved, using the full ILO U/C classification. Small films may be of particular use in a large-scale survey, in which the abnormality rate is expected to be low, and which might otherwise be too expensive. A sensitive reading method and a high standard of film quality are essential factors in the use of this technique.
摘要 在一项关于英国海军造船厂石棉暴露影响的调查中,对674名男性的小胸片和大胸片进行了检查。这些胸片由两名阅片者在调查条件下采用简单的筛查分类法进行阅读,同时也在一项对照试验中由五名阅片者采用国际劳工组织(ILO)的完整U/C分类法进行阅读。阅读方法之间的比较表明,无论胸片大小,当使用筛查分类法时,在检测石棉相关的影像学异常方面至少存在30%的不足。为了获得足够的诊断敏感性,ILO U/C分类法似乎至关重要。与大胸片阅读结果直接比较时,大多数阅片者在小胸片上观察到的显著异常存在43%的不足。通过让五名阅片者中的任何一人在小胸片的任何异常水平上进行阅读,这种不足可减少到7%。当ILO U/C阅读结果与临床诊断相关时,唯一漏诊的异常是一个小的胸膜斑。在阅读试验期间,每隔一段时间插入预先商定编码的胸片,有助于保持阅读的一致性。除了全尺寸的后前位片外,还为1884名男性拍摄了右斜位片,但该视图提供的帮助被证明不足以证明其在大规模调查中的使用合理性。假设异常率不超过5%,当使用小胸片作为筛查方法时,调查成本降低到使用大胸片时成本的三分之一到二分之一。然而,小胸片的这种成本优势可能会被自动大胸片设备的发展所取代。使用小胸片时的辐射剂量增加了约20倍,但仍在规定的安全水平内。结论是,至少应让三名阅片者参与,采用完整的ILO U/C分类法。小胸片在大规模调查中可能特别有用,在这种调查中预计异常率较低,否则可能过于昂贵。敏感的阅读方法和高标准的胶片质量是使用该技术的关键因素。