Suppr超能文献

胆囊收缩素胆囊造影术、超声检查及闪烁扫描术:慢性非结石性胆囊炎的检测

Cholecystokinin cholecystography, sonography, and scintigraphy: detection of chronic acalculous cholecystitis.

作者信息

Davis G B, Berk R N, Scheible F W, Witztum K F, Gilmore I T, Strong R M, Hofmann A F

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Dec;139(6):1117-21. doi: 10.2214/ajr.139.6.1117.

Abstract

Because the efficacy of cholecystokinin cholecystography in the detection of chronic acalculous cholecystitis remains in doubt, the procedure is rarely used in clinical practice. However, the ability to observe gallbladder contraction with sonography and 99mTc-para-isopropylacetanilido-iminodiacetic acid cholescintigraphy (PIPIDA) offers a possibility to improve the sensitivity of the test. To determine if the degree of gallbladder contraction after cholecystokinin is the same as measured by the three techniques and if it differs in symptomatic patients compared to the normal population, cholecystokinin cholecystography, cholecystokinin sonography, and cholecystokinin PIPIDA were performed in 10 symptomatic patients and 10 normal volunteers. The mean maximum contraction of the gallbladder during the three studies was 63%, 61%, and 68%, respectively, for the volunteers, and 72%, 63%, and 73%, respectively, for the patients. The mean maximum gallbladder contraction during all three procedures was 64% +/- 26% SD in the volunteers and 74% +/- 17% SD in the patients. The differences were not statistically significant. Although there was good correlation in the degree of maximum gallbladder contraction among cholecystokinin cholecystography, cholecystokinin sonography, and cholecystokinin PIPIDA, marked variation in both the volunteers and the patients makes it unlikely that the degree of contraction as observed by any of these techniques can be used to indicate the presence of chronic acalculous cholecystitis.

摘要

由于胆囊收缩素胆囊造影术在检测慢性非结石性胆囊炎方面的疗效仍存疑问,该检查在临床实践中很少使用。然而,超声检查和99mTc-对异丙基乙酰苯胺亚氨基二乙酸胆系闪烁造影术(PIPIDA)观察胆囊收缩的能力为提高检查的敏感性提供了可能。为了确定胆囊收缩素刺激后胆囊收缩程度在这三种技术检测下是否相同,以及有症状患者与正常人群相比是否存在差异,对10例有症状患者和10名正常志愿者进行了胆囊收缩素胆囊造影术、胆囊收缩素超声检查和胆囊收缩素PIPIDA检查。在三项研究中,志愿者胆囊的平均最大收缩率分别为63%、61%和68%,患者分别为72%、63%和73%。在所有三项检查中,志愿者胆囊的平均最大收缩率为64%±26%标准差,患者为74%±17%标准差。差异无统计学意义。尽管胆囊收缩素胆囊造影术、胆囊收缩素超声检查和胆囊收缩素PIPIDA在最大胆囊收缩程度上有良好的相关性,但志愿者和患者中均存在明显差异,使得通过这些技术观察到的收缩程度不太可能用于指示慢性非结石性胆囊炎的存在。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验