• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The efficacy of a population-based comparison group in cross-sectional occupational health studies.

作者信息

Schulte P A, Singal M, Stringer W T, Kominsky J R, Landrigan P J

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Dec;116(6):981-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113500.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113500
PMID:6983296
Abstract

The availability and the choice of appropriate comparison groups are essential for valid occupational epidemiologic studies. Too often, however, adequate comparison groups cannot easily be found within a workplace environment or extracted from the general population. An evaluation of the efficacy of using a pool of comparison subjects from the health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES) was performed on data gathered by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in 1979. Comparison groups from the HANES pool were derived for 246 workers at four different commercial/industrial facilities in the Niagara Falls, New York, area and the comparability between the groups was assessed for several demographic, behavioural, and biomedical variables. The HANES groups exhibited a high degree of comparability with regard to most variables, excluding ancestry. The HANES pool may serve as a useful source of subjects to allow for the comparison of disease rates where occupational exposure is the key distinguishing feature between groups.

摘要

相似文献

1
The efficacy of a population-based comparison group in cross-sectional occupational health studies.
Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Dec;116(6):981-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113500.
2
Exposure to Secondhand Smoke Among Nonsmokers in New York City in the Context of Recent Tobacco Control Policies: Current Status, Changes Over the Past Decade, and National Comparisons.纽约市近期烟草控制政策背景下非吸烟者接触二手烟的情况:现状、过去十年的变化及全国比较
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Nov;18(11):2065-2074. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw135. Epub 2016 May 17.
3
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
4
Study design and participation rates of the New York City Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2004.2004年纽约市健康与营养检查调查的研究设计及参与率
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Jul;3(3):A94. Epub 2006 Jun 15.
5
Occupation and cancer - follow-up of 15 million people in five Nordic countries.职业与癌症 - 五个北欧国家的 1500 万人随访研究。
Acta Oncol. 2009;48(5):646-790. doi: 10.1080/02841860902913546.
6
Prevalence of dermatitis in the working population, United States, 2010 National Health Interview Survey.2010 年美国全国健康访谈调查:工作人群中的皮炎流行率。
Am J Ind Med. 2013 Jun;56(6):625-34. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22080. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
7
Mortality, morbidity and health selection among metal workers.金属工人的死亡率、发病率及健康选择
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;23 Suppl 2:1-80.
8
Urinary incontinence in women in relation to occupational status.职业状况与女性尿失禁的关系。
Women Health. 2017 Jan;57(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2016.1150387. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
9
[Evaluation of acceptable exposure levels to industrial and environmental pollutants: problems raised because of the interpretation of epidemiological data].[工业和环境污染物可接受暴露水平的评估:由于流行病学数据的解读而引发的问题]
Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg. 1996;151(5-6):295-303; discussion 304-5.
10
Significance of cross-sectional surveys in occupational epidemiology.横断面调查在职业流行病学中的意义。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1982;8 Suppl 1:24-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of direct surveys in the surveillance of occupational illness and injury.直接调查在职业疾病和伤害监测中的应用。
Am J Public Health. 1989 Dec;79 Suppl(Suppl):12-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.suppl.12.