Chen M S
J Prosthet Dent. 1980 Feb;43(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90175-4.
A study was carried out to measure the distance between the fovea palatini and the vibrating line. 1. The nose-blowing method appears to be an accurate method for locating the fovea palatini and the vibrating line. 2. Seventy percent of the subjects observed in this study had two fovea palatini. 3. When present, the fovea palatini of 25% of the subjects lay directly on the vibrating line. 4. In 7% of the subjects the fovea palatini were located within 1 to 2 mm posterior to the vibrating line, in 18.8% within 2 to 3 mm posterior to the vibrating line, in 27.1% within 3 to 4 mm posterior to the vibrating line, in 16% within 4 to 5 mm posterior to the vibrating line, in 4.9% within 5 to 6 mm posterior to the vibrating line, and in 1.4% more than 6 mm posterior to the vibrating line. 5. The fovea palatini are unreliable guides for locating the center portion of the posterior border of the maxillary denture.
开展了一项研究以测量腭小凹与颤动线之间的距离。1. 擤鼻法似乎是定位腭小凹和颤动线的一种准确方法。2. 在本研究观察的受试者中,70% 有两个腭小凹。3. 存在腭小凹时,25% 的受试者的腭小凹直接位于颤动线上。4. 在 7% 的受试者中,腭小凹位于颤动线后方 1 至 2 毫米内,在 18.8% 的受试者中位于颤动线后方 2 至 3 毫米内,在 27.1% 的受试者中位于颤动线后方 3 至 4 毫米内,在 16% 的受试者中位于颤动线后方 4 至 5 毫米内,在 4.9% 的受试者中位于颤动线后方 5 至 6 毫米内,在 1.4% 的受试者中位于颤动线后方超过 6 毫米处。5. 腭小凹不是确定上颌义齿后缘中央部分位置的可靠标志。