Winn W C, Gillenwater J Y
Urology. 1980 Jan;15(1):44-6. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(80)90538-5.
The Uricult dip slide was compared to traditional methods of bacterial isolation and quantitation in two different hospital wards. In a chronic care ward for patients with spinal cord injuries, the correlation of the dip slide and pour plate results was 96 per cent; there were very few specimens which had colony counts between 10(4) and 10(5) per ml. In a busy emergency room, the correlation between the dip slide and quantitative loop techniques was 75 per cent. In this population 18 per cent of the dip slide and 2l per cent of the calibrated loop cultures yielded colony counts between 10(4) and 10(5) per ml., and most of these cultures contained a mixture of bacteria. The results show that the Uricult dip slide performs well under ideal conditions. The dip slide can alleviate, but not eliminate, the problem of mixed bacterial growth at 10(4) to 10(5) colones per ml. The usefulness of the slide must be assessed in relation to the patient population and clinical situation in which it is to be employed.
在两个不同的医院病房中,对Uricult浸片与传统细菌分离和定量方法进行了比较。在一个脊髓损伤患者的慢性病护理病房中,浸片与倾注平板结果的相关性为96%;每毫升菌落数在10⁴至10⁵之间的标本非常少。在繁忙的急诊室中,浸片与定量环技术之间的相关性为75%。在这个群体中,18%的浸片培养物和21%的校准环培养物每毫升菌落数在10⁴至10⁵之间,并且这些培养物中的大多数都含有混合细菌。结果表明,Uricult浸片在理想条件下表现良好。浸片可以缓解但不能消除每毫升10⁴至10⁵个菌落时混合细菌生长的问题。必须根据其使用的患者群体和临床情况来评估该浸片的实用性。