Blumenschein G R, Hortobagyi G N, Richman S P, Gutterman J U, Tashima C K, Buzdar A U, Burgess M A, Livingston R B, Hersh E M
Cancer. 1980 Feb 15;45(4):742-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800215)45:4<742::aid-cncr2820450422>3.0.co;2-x.
One hundred fifty-six evaluable patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with vincristine, Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide alternating at fixed intervals with 5-FU and methotrexate. Immunotherapy with BCG or MER-BCG was administered to all patients in two consecutive treatment programs. Overall objective response rate and complete response rate were 67% and 20%, respectively. These were not significantly different between the two immunotherapeutic groups. The median time to progression was sixteen-and-a-half months from initiation of therapy. The median survival of all patients was 21 months and that of responders was 26 months. Response rates, time to progression, and survival showed no significant advantage over a recent historical control group treated with FAC-BCG. Toxicity related to the gastrointestinal tract and bone marrow was considerably higher in this protocol than in the FAC combinations. MER at the dose, route, and schedule administered in this protocol caused excessive local and systemic toxic reactions. The alternate use of these noncross-resistant combinations in advanced breast cancer is not superior to combination chemotherapy used in the traditional manner.
156例可评估的转移性乳腺癌患者接受了长春新碱、阿霉素和环磷酰胺治疗,它们与5-氟尿嘧啶和甲氨蝶呤按固定间隔交替使用。在两个连续的治疗方案中,所有患者均接受了卡介苗或MER-卡介苗免疫治疗。总体客观缓解率和完全缓解率分别为67%和20%。这两个免疫治疗组之间没有显著差异。从开始治疗起,疾病进展的中位时间为16.5个月。所有患者的中位生存期为21个月,缓解者为26个月。与最近接受FAC-卡介苗治疗的历史对照组相比,缓解率、疾病进展时间和生存期均无显著优势。该方案中与胃肠道和骨髓相关的毒性比FAC联合方案高得多。该方案中所使用的剂量、途径和给药时间表的MER引起了过度的局部和全身毒性反应。在晚期乳腺癌中交替使用这些非交叉耐药联合方案并不优于传统方式使用的联合化疗。