医院陷入了监管困境。
Hospitals are caught in regulatory crossruff.
作者信息
Walker S R, Berry R E
出版信息
Hospitals. 1980 Jun 16;54(12):74-6.
PMID:6989741
Abstract
HHS and IRS are good examples of federal agencies that, each responsible to its own unique regulatory, manage to frequently undermine congressional health policy intent.
摘要
美国卫生与公众服务部（HHS）和美国国税局（IRS）就是联邦机构的典型例子，它们各自负责独特的监管工作，却常常破坏国会的卫生政策意图。
相似文献
1
Hospitals are caught in regulatory crossruff.医院陷入了监管困境。
Hospitals. 1980 Jun 16;54(12):74-6.
2
Government regulations interviews.政府规定访谈。
Mich Hosp. 1979 Dec;15(12):4-9.
3
Retroactivity and administrative rulemaking.追溯力与行政规则制定。
Duke Law J. 1991 Feb(1):106-65.
4
The etiquette of Chevron: was the court serving escargot or the main course?雪佛龙公司的礼仪：当时法庭是在供应蜗牛还是主菜？
J Health Hosp Law. 1997 Jun;30(2):103-12.
5
Recruiting physicians within IRS and HHS guidelines.按照美国国税局（IRS）和美国卫生与公众服务部（HHS）的指导方针招聘医生。
Health Care Strateg Manage. 1992 Dec;10(12):13-4.
6
Medicaid rule worries providers.医疗补助计划规则令提供者担忧。
Mod Healthc. 1992 Aug 24;22(34):38.
7
OAH sues HHS over change in Medicare policy on billing liability insurers.美国矫形外科学会就医疗保险向责任保险公司计费政策的变更起诉美国卫生与公众服务部。
Health Law Vigil. 1988 Jul 15;11(15):1-3.
8
Litigation vs regulation.诉讼与监管
Hospitals. 1978 Sep 1;52(17):58-61.
9
Unified agenda of federal regulatory and deregulatory actions--HHS. Semiannual regulatory agenda.联邦监管与放松监管行动统一议程——美国卫生与公众服务部。半年期监管议程。
Fed Regist. 1997 Oct 29;62(209 Pt 2):57458-545.
10
Medicare payment to hospitals for a return on capital: the influence of federal budget policy on judicial decision-making.医疗保险向医院支付资本回报：联邦预算政策对司法决策的影响。
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon). 1987 Sep;9(3):7-34.
Zotero 插件