Wheeler F B, Santora A C, Elsas L J
Endocrinology. 1980 Jul;107(1):195-207. doi: 10.1210/endo-107-1-195.
Curvilinear Scatchard plots for insulin binding by cultured embryonic heart cells at 15 C were interpreted assuming a two-receptor model (Santora II, A. C., F.B. Wheeler, R.L. DeHaan, and L.J. Elsas II, Endocrinology 104:1059, 1979). The present studies test this hypothesis further. Both 125I-labeled hormone binding and 2-methylamino-[1-14C]isobutyric acid ([14C]meAIB) transport were assayed at 24 C in identical buffers. Equilibrium chicken insulin-binding experiments yielded curvilinear Scatchard functions, consistent with binding to both high affinity, low capacity and low affinity, high capacity receptor sites at 24 C. Insulin-stimulated transport of the model amino acid [14C]meAIB (a specific alanine-preferring system substrate) paralleled the expected occupancy of the low affinity receptors. In competitive binding assays, the abilities of multiplication-stimulating activity (MSA), proinsulin, and insulin to compete for primarily high affinity insulin binding were compared with their abilities to stimulate transport. The relative potencies for binding competition with 34 pM chicken [125I]insulin were insulin greater than proinsulin greater than or equal to MSA (1:0,05:0.03). In contrast, the relative potencies for stimulating [14C]meAIB transport were MSA greater than insulin greater than proinsulin (3:1:0.28). Maximal stimulation of transport by insulin was not additive to that by MSA or proinsulin. The relative potency profile for binding competition with [125I]MSA was the same as that for stimulation of transport: MSA greater than insulin greater than proinsulin (2-3:1:0.2-0.3). Proinsulin, added in excess of insulin at a constant molar ratio, reduced low affinity insulin binding to a greater extent than it reduced high affinity insulin binding. Moreover, the extent of binding to each receptor was predicted from, and thus directly supported, our biological potency data, in which proinsulin was nearly one third as potent as insulin at the low affinity receptor yet possessed only 5% of insulin's potency at the high affinity receptor. The different relative affinity profiles suggest that these two receptors had binding site specificities for different portions of the insulin molecule. Each experiment with proinsulin and insulin in a constant molar ratio was carried out in parallel with an experiment in which insulin was the only unlabeled hormone. Analysis of the results from weighted nonlinear least squares regression fits of data to Michaelis-Menten equations showed that a two-receptor model was necessary to fit the data obtained with insulin as the only unlabeled hormone. Low affinity site binding parameters were also needed when data within each parallel experiment were pooled. The following kinetic experiments indicated the absence of enhanced dissociation of bound [125I]insulin by unlabeled insulin...
在15℃下,培养的胚胎心脏细胞对胰岛素的结合呈现曲线型Scatchard图,采用双受体模型进行解释(Santora II, A. C., F.B. Wheeler, R.L. DeHaan, and L.J. Elsas II, 《内分泌学》104:1059, 1979)。本研究进一步验证了这一假说。在24℃下,于相同缓冲液中测定了125I标记的激素结合以及2-甲基氨基-[1-14C]异丁酸([14C]meAIB)的转运。平衡状态下鸡胰岛素结合实验产生了曲线型Scatchard函数,这与在24℃时与高亲和力、低容量以及低亲和力、高容量受体位点的结合情况相符。胰岛素刺激的模型氨基酸[14C]meAIB(一种特定的偏好丙氨酸的系统底物)转运与低亲和力受体的预期占有率平行。在竞争性结合实验中,比较了促有丝分裂活性(MSA)、胰岛素原和胰岛素竞争主要高亲和力胰岛素结合的能力与其刺激转运的能力。与34 pM鸡[125I]胰岛素进行结合竞争的相对效力为胰岛素>胰岛素原≥MSA(1:0.05:0.03)。相反,刺激[14C]meAIB转运的相对效力为MSA>胰岛素>胰岛素原(3:1:0.28)。胰岛素对转运的最大刺激作用与MSA或胰岛素原的刺激作用并非相加关系。与[125I]MSA进行结合竞争的相对效力谱与刺激转运的相同:MSA>胰岛素>胰岛素原(2 - 3:1:0.2 - 0.3)。以恒定摩尔比加入过量胰岛素原时,其对低亲和力胰岛素结合的降低程度大于对高亲和力胰岛素结合的降低程度。此外,与每个受体的结合程度可从我们的生物学效力数据中预测得出,从而直接得到支持,在该数据中,胰岛素原在低亲和力受体处的效力约为胰岛素的三分之一,但在高亲和力受体处仅具有胰岛素效力的5%。不同的相对亲和力谱表明这两种受体对胰岛素分子的不同部分具有结合位点特异性。每次以恒定摩尔比进行胰岛素原和胰岛素的实验均与仅以胰岛素作为未标记激素的实验平行开展。对数据进行加权非线性最小二乘回归拟合到米氏方程的结果分析表明,采用双受体模型才能拟合仅以胰岛素作为未标记激素时获得的数据。当合并每个平行实验中的数据时,也需要低亲和力位点的结合参数。以下动力学实验表明未标记的胰岛素不会增强结合的[125I]胰岛素的解离……