Listgarten M A
J Clin Periodontol. 1980 Jun;7(3):165-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1980.tb01960.x.
The periodontal probe has been and continues to be used as an important diagnostic instrument by the dental profession. The measurements recorded with the probe have generally been considered to represent a reasonably accurate estimate of sulcus or pocket depth. Recent reports on the histopathology of the periodontal lesion and the histological features of a healing lesion, together with histological studies on the relationship of the probe to periodontal tissues, have shed some new light on periodontal probing. It is now apparent that probing depth measured from the gingival margin seldom corresponds to sulcus or pocket depth. The discrepancy is least in the absence of inflammatory changes and increases with increasing degrees of inflammation. In the presence of periodontitis the probe tip passes through the inflamed tissues to stop at the level of the most coronal intact dento-gingival fibers, approximately 0.3-0.5 mm apical to the apical termination of the junctional epithelium. Decreased probing depth measurements following periodontal therapy may be due in part to decreased penetrability of the gingival tissues by the probe. Following treatment aimed at obtaining new attachment in periodontal defects, wider variations may occur between the location of the probe tip and the most coronal dento-gingival fibers than in the case of untreated sites. This is due in part to the formation of a so-called "long" junctional epithelium. In the absence of inflammation this epithelium may not be penetrable during ordinary probing, but could account for a rapid increase in probing depth measurements when inflammatory changes allow the probe to traverse the epithelium and/or the adjacent infiltrated connective tissue. In view of the difficulty inherent in relating periodontal probing measurements to actual sulcus or pocket depth, the interpretation of periodontal probing in the practice of periodontics may need reappraisal.
牙周探针一直以来并将继续被牙科专业用作重要的诊断工具。用该探针记录的测量值通常被认为能合理准确地估计龈沟或牙周袋深度。近期有关牙周病变组织病理学以及愈合病变组织学特征的报告,连同关于探针与牙周组织关系的组织学研究,为牙周探诊带来了一些新的认识。现在很明显,从牙龈边缘测量的探诊深度很少与龈沟或牙周袋深度相符。在没有炎症变化时这种差异最小,且随着炎症程度的增加而增大。在牙周炎存在的情况下,探针尖端穿过炎症组织,止于最冠方完整的牙-龈纤维水平,大约在结合上皮顶端终止处根尖向0.3 - 0.5毫米处。牙周治疗后探诊深度测量值降低可能部分归因于探针穿透牙龈组织的能力下降。在旨在使牙周缺损获得新附着的治疗后,探针尖端位置与最冠方牙-龈纤维之间的差异可能比未治疗部位更大。这部分是由于形成了所谓的“长”结合上皮。在没有炎症时,这种上皮在普通探诊过程中可能无法穿透,但当炎症变化使探针能够穿过上皮和/或相邻的浸润结缔组织时,可能会导致探诊深度测量值迅速增加。鉴于将牙周探诊测量值与实际龈沟或牙周袋深度相关联存在内在困难,牙周病临床实践中对牙周探诊的解读可能需要重新评估。