Harrison L H
J Urol. 1980 Sep;124(3):347-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55442-7.
A comparison of povidone-iodine to a placebo gel as urinary catheter lubricants focused on the effects of urethral bacterial counts and on patient comfort. The 50 patients were divided into 2 parallel groups in a single blind study. Both lubricants lowered the bacterial counts, with the reduction achieved by povidone-iodine gel significantly greater than the reduction associated with the placebo (p less than 0.02). The numbers of patients experiencing discomfort from the 2 preparations did not differ nor was there any difference in the degree of discomfort, which was minimal for both groups. No other adverse side effects were reported for either lubricant.
一项关于聚维酮碘与安慰剂凝胶作为尿道导管润滑剂的比较研究，重点关注尿道细菌计数的影响和患者舒适度。在一项单盲研究中，50名患者被分为2个平行组。两种润滑剂都降低了细菌计数，聚维酮碘凝胶实现的细菌计数降低显著大于与安慰剂相关的降低（p小于0.02）。两种制剂导致不适的患者数量没有差异，不适程度也没有差异，两组的不适程度都很小。两种润滑剂均未报告其他不良副作用。
