Suppr超能文献

患者对全口义齿技术变化的反应。第四部分:剩余牙槽嵴吸收——模型评估。

Patient response to variations in complete denture technique. Part IV: Residual ridge resorption--cast evaluation.

作者信息

Brehm T W, Abadi B J

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1980 Nov;44(5):491-4. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90065-7.

Abstract

At 10-year recall, alveolar ridge topography was compared by three different methods in 36 patients whose complete dentures were fabricated by two different techniques. In general, if alveolar ridge change was observed, it was evidenced by a reduction in size following denture wearing. Group II patients appeared to have slightly less ridge change in the subjective and ridge width evaluations, but group I patients showed slightly less ridge change in the contourator tracing measurements. Since alveolar ridge topography is influenced by many variables, it would be a mistake to claim that either denture technique was proven superior by this research effort. Overall, the alveolar ridge changes were so small that they were statistically insignificant for this sample size. Some possible factors that might explain the minimal alveolar ridge changes seen in this study are (1) conscientious application of sound basic prosthodontic principles by the dentists who constructed the dentures initially, (2) periodic recall appointments for all of the patients, and (3) the fact that all of the patients were relatively young, experienced denture wearers who had been edentulous for at least 1 year before these tested dentures were placed.

摘要

在10年的随访中,对36例采用两种不同技术制作全口义齿的患者,用三种不同方法比较了牙槽嵴形态。总体而言,若观察到牙槽嵴有变化,表现为戴义齿后尺寸减小。在主观评估和牙槽嵴宽度评估中,第二组患者的牙槽嵴变化似乎略少,但在轮廓描记测量中,第一组患者的牙槽嵴变化略少。由于牙槽嵴形态受多种变量影响,声称这项研究证明了哪种义齿技术更优越是错误的。总体而言,牙槽嵴变化非常小,对于这个样本量来说在统计学上不显著。一些可能解释本研究中所见牙槽嵴变化极小的因素有:(1)最初制作义齿的牙医认真应用了合理的基本口腔修复学原则;(2)所有患者都定期进行随访预约;(3)所有患者相对年轻,是有经验的义齿佩戴者,在佩戴这些受试义齿之前至少已无牙1年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验