Askenfelt A, Gauffin J, Sundberg J, Kitzing P
J Speech Hear Res. 1980 Jun;23(2):258-73. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2302.258.
Signals from a throat contact microphone or an electroglottograph often are more suited for fundamental frequency measurements with simple analog circuits than the radiated speech signal. This report compares a contact (accelerometer) microphone placed on the neck below the cricoid cartilage and an electroglottograph for measurement of fundamental frequency in connected speech. The advantages and drawbacks of the two methods are discussed.
来自喉部接触式麦克风或电子声门仪的信号，通常比辐射的语音信号更适合用简单的模拟电路进行基频测量。本报告比较了放置在环状软骨下方颈部的接触式（加速度计）麦克风和电子声门仪在连续语音中测量基频的情况。讨论了这两种方法的优缺点。
