Lussier A, Rouleau L, Caron M, Tétreault L
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1980 Nov;18(11):482-7.
Thirty-six patients with definite or classical rheumatoid arthritis were studied in a 6-week double-blind parallel trial. They were randomly divided into three groups and received either carprofen stepwise 150, 200, and 250 mg/day, carprofen 350, 400, and 450 mg/day or indomethacin 100 mg/day. Classical methods and parameters for evaluating the disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis were used. A large panel of laboratory tests were also involved in the assessment of toxicity. Although the incidence of adverse effects was similar for both drugs, cutaneous and gastrointestinal symptoms were more frequent with carprofen than with indomethacin, whereas central nervous system reactions were elicited more often with the latter drugs. For most of the efficacy variables studied, the carprofen high dosage regimen at weeks 5 and 6 was shown statistically superior or at least not different from the indomethacin group; both of these were superior to the carprofen low dosage regimen.
在一项为期6周的双盲平行试验中,对36例确诊或典型类风湿性关节炎患者进行了研究。他们被随机分为三组,分别接受每日逐步递增剂量为150、200和250毫克的卡洛芬、每日剂量为350、400和450毫克的卡洛芬或每日100毫克的吲哚美辛治疗。采用经典方法和参数评估类风湿性关节炎的疾病活动度。一大组实验室检查也参与了毒性评估。尽管两种药物的不良反应发生率相似,但卡洛芬引起的皮肤和胃肠道症状比吲哚美辛更常见,而后者引起的中枢神经系统反应更频繁。对于大多数所研究的疗效变量,在第5周和第6周时,卡洛芬高剂量方案在统计学上显示优于吲哚美辛组,或至少与吲哚美辛组无差异;这两组均优于卡洛芬低剂量方案。