Stall K E, Martin E W
J Reprod Med. 1981 Feb;26(2):73-9.
To evaluate the significance of plasma levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with ovarian cancer, a chart review of such patients from May 1974 to August 1978 was undertaken, along with a literature survey in order to consolidate the data for analysis. The data indicate the CEA levels are consistently lower in ovarian cancer than in colorectal cancer and that the assay is not of value in the primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer. It may, however, be of prognostic significance in that advanced disease and undifferentiated tumors which carry the worst prognoses demonstrate elevated CEA levels with higher frequency. CEA levels may also be of value in assessing the response to therapy and in detecting recurrent disease. Patients who demonstrated good clinical responses to therapy showed a drop to low plasma CEA levels while patients with poor responses showed no decrease or a rise in CEA levels. Moreover, CEA rose again after a postoperative drop in patients with recurrent disease before they demonstrated clinical evidence of recurrence. The relationship of plasma levels to tissue levels of CEA and to histologic type of ovarian carcinoma remains unclear.
为评估癌胚抗原(CEA)血浆水平在卵巢癌患者中的意义,我们对1974年5月至1978年8月期间的此类患者进行了病历回顾,并进行了文献调查,以便汇总数据进行分析。数据表明,卵巢癌患者的CEA水平始终低于结直肠癌患者,且该检测对卵巢癌的初步诊断无价值。然而,它可能具有预后意义,因为预后最差的晚期疾病和未分化肿瘤显示CEA水平升高的频率更高。CEA水平在评估治疗反应和检测复发性疾病方面也可能有价值。对治疗有良好临床反应的患者血浆CEA水平降至较低水平,而反应不佳的患者CEA水平无下降或升高。此外,复发疾病患者术后CEA水平下降后,在出现临床复发证据之前又再次升高。血浆CEA水平与组织CEA水平以及卵巢癌组织学类型之间的关系仍不清楚。