Fisch L
Br J Audiol. 1981 May;15(2):87-95. doi: 10.3109/03005368109081420.
It is now 50 years since serious attempts have been made to detect hearing impairment in school children, first by using the "Fading numbers gramophone audiometer" (in 1930-31) and later (in 1954) by the "Pure tone, sweep frequency, audiometric tests". There is good evidence to show (based to experience from this and many other countries) that by a properly organized screening programme, on the average, 6% of school children will be discovered to have significant hearing impairment and that without screening most of these will not be developed in this country unevenly and there are still many places where it is not practised properly or not at all. One of the reasons for this is the serious lack of understanding of the importance of screening by the authorities and, until recently, almost a complete lack of guidance by the Department of Health and Social Security. It is recommended also that systematic school-leaving audiometry should be introduced. The preventive and epidemiological significance of school leaving audiometry is stressed. Its potential importance in relation to industrial audiology is discussed. Impedance measurements are important but tests of middle-ear function should not be used as screening tests of hearing. First of all they are far too sensitive as a screening device and also it may lead to non-detection of many specific but significant sensorineural hearing losses (which are more frequent in children than generally assumed). However, it is hoped that eventually all children discovered to have a hearing loss, as a result of screening audiometry, will have a full test of middle-ear function. The two tests are complementary and not mutually exclusive.
自首次尝试检测学童听力障碍至今已有50年了,最初是在1930 - 1931年使用“渐隐数字留声机听力计”,后来在1954年采用“纯音、扫频听力测试”。有充分证据表明(基于本国及许多其他国家的经验),通过合理组织的筛查项目,平均而言,6%的学童会被发现有明显的听力障碍,而且如果不进行筛查,其中大多数在本国不会被发现。在这个国家,筛查工作开展得不均衡,仍有许多地方筛查工作开展不当或根本未开展。原因之一是当局严重缺乏对筛查重要性的认识,而且直到最近,卫生与社会保障部几乎完全缺乏指导。还建议引入系统性的离校听力检测。强调了离校听力检测的预防和流行病学意义。讨论了其在工业听力学方面的潜在重要性。阻抗测量很重要,但中耳功能测试不应用作听力筛查测试。首先,作为筛查手段,它们过于敏感,而且还可能导致许多特定但显著的感音神经性听力损失未被检测出来(这种损失在儿童中比一般认为的更为常见)。然而,希望最终所有因听力筛查检测出有听力损失的儿童都能接受全面的中耳功能测试。这两项测试是互补的,并非相互排斥。