Kurzynski T A, Van Holten C M
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 May;13(5):891-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.5.891-894.1981.
In the first study, selective sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim blood agar (SXT-BA) and conventional blood agar (BA) plates incubated under CO2 and anaerobically were compared for their ability to recover group A streptococci from throat cultures. Recovery rates were: SXT-BA (anaerobic), 100%; SXT-BA (CO2), 98%; BA (anaerobic), 89.2%; and BA (CO2), 76.5%. Primary plate bacitracin test results could be read on significantly more of the SXT-BA plates. Readability rates were: SXT-BA (anaerobic), 97%; SXT-BA (CO2), 96%; BA (anaerobic), 70.6%; and BA (CO2), 32.4%. A second study compared with the SXT-BA method versus a BA-double-disk (BA-DD) method which utilizes conventional media with addition of a bacitracin differentiation and a sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim susceptibility disk placed adjacent to one another in the heavy area of inoculation. Isolation rates were: SXT-BA, 100% and BA-DD, 88%. Readability rates for direct bacitracin tests were: SXT-BA, 92% and BA-DD, 76.2%. In our hands, the SXT-BA method was superior for yielding highest isolation rates and for yielding highest readability rates of direct bacitracin test results.
在第一项研究中,比较了选择性磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶血琼脂(SXT-BA)平板和传统血琼脂(BA)平板在二氧化碳培养箱及厌氧条件下从咽喉培养物中分离A组链球菌的能力。回收率分别为:SXT-BA(厌氧),100%;SXT-BA(二氧化碳),98%;BA(厌氧),89.2%;BA(二氧化碳),76.5%。在显著更多的SXT-BA平板上可以读取初次平板杆菌肽试验结果。可读率分别为:SXT-BA(厌氧),97%;SXT-BA(二氧化碳),96%;BA(厌氧),70.6%;BA(二氧化碳),32.4%。第二项研究将SXT-BA方法与BA双盘法(BA-DD)进行了比较,后者使用的是在接种密集区相邻放置杆菌肽鉴别盘和磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶药敏盘的传统培养基。分离率分别为:SXT-BA,100%;BA-DD,88%。直接杆菌肽试验的可读率分别为:SXT-BA,92%;BA-DD,76.2%。在我们的操作中,SXT-BA方法在获得最高分离率以及直接杆菌肽试验结果的最高可读率方面表现更优。