• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Double-blind comparison of L-keflex and cephalexin (Keflex) in dental infections (author's transl)].

作者信息

Horii M, Morinaga T, Shimada S, Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, Nishimura T, Noshi Y, Okada T, Sasaki T, Ikeda S, Takada S, Iizuka O, Kimura J, Sagara S, Inada Y, Nishioka Y, Kimata M

出版信息

Jpn J Antibiot. 1980 Nov;33(11):1194-214.

PMID:7017189
Abstract

In order to evaluate efficacy and safety of L-Keflex (granule form of sustained release cephalexin), a double blind study comparing it with Keflex (capsule of regular cephalexin) was conducted in dental infections. Evaluable cases in adults for efficacy of the drugs were 196 consisting of 97 for L-Keflex and 99 for Keflex. Those in children were 19 (8 for L-Keflex and 11 for Keflex). There were no significant differences in background of the patients and severity of the diseases between both groups (L-Keflex and Keflex groups). The daily doses used in both groups were 1,000 mg in adults and 500 mg in children, respectively. The dose was given in two divided doses for L-Keflex group and in four divided doses for Keflex group. Following are evaluation by the committee members for the study: Adults 1. Clinical response rate at final therapy day was 93.8% in L-Keflex group and 92.9% in Keflex group, showing no significant difference between both groups. 2. No significant difference in severity of subjective and objective symptoms between both groups was observed at each therapy day. 3. Side effects were found in 6.7% of 105 patients receiving L-Keflex and in 5.6% of 107 patients with Keflex, and there was no significant difference between both groups. As the side effects, gastrointestinal symptoms, rash and itching were observed, but no any other side effects were found in both groups. Children 1. As shown in the above, number of the cases enough to evaluate statistically was not obtained, but all of both groups clinically responded to the drugs. 2. As for side effects diarrhea was observed in only one patient of Keflex group consisting of 12 patients. In the patient, however, discontinuation of the drug was not required and the side effect disappeared during the therapy. From the above results, L-Keflex (granule) is judged to have more convenience than Keflex (capsule) in that (1) it can be administered with b.i.d. regimen and (2) it can be easily taken in dental patients such as patients having difficulty in opening mouth of swallowing pain.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Double-blind comparison of L-keflex and cephalexin (Keflex) in dental infections (author's transl)].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1980 Nov;33(11):1194-214.
2
[Fundamental and clinical studies of sustained release cephalexin (L-Keflex) in the field of oral surgery (author's transl)].口服外科领域中头孢氨苄缓释制剂(L-凯复定)的基础与临床研究(作者译)
Jpn J Antibiot. 1980 Apr;33(4):514-21.
3
[A double-blind comparison between cefaclor and cephalexin in the treatment of dental infections].头孢克洛与头孢氨苄治疗牙齿感染的双盲比较
Jpn J Antibiot. 1984 Jan;37(1):152-75.
4
[Clinical evaluation of sustained release preparations of cefaclor in dental infections. Comparative double blind clinical studies of sustained release preparations with a regular preparation of cefaclor].头孢克洛缓释制剂在牙科感染中的临床评价。头孢克洛缓释制剂与常规制剂的比较双盲临床研究
Jpn J Antibiot. 1985 Apr;38(4):1117-40.
5
[Clinical study of sustained release cephalexin (S-6436, S-6437) in dermatology (author's transl)].头孢氨苄缓释剂(S - 6436、S - 6437)在皮肤科的临床研究(作者译)
Jpn J Antibiot. 1977 Nov;30(11):911-5.
6
[Clinical experience with sustained release cefalexin (S-6437) for pediatric use in pediatrics (author's transl)].小儿用头孢氨苄缓释剂(S-6437)的临床经验(作者译)
Jpn J Antibiot. 1977 Nov;30(11):881-7.
7
[Clinical experience with sustained release cephalexin (X-6437) (author's transl)].头孢氨苄缓释剂(X-6437)的临床经验(作者译)
Jpn J Antibiot. 1977 Nov;30(11):888-92.
8
[Clinical experience with sustained release cephalexin (S-6437) in pediatrics (author's transl)].小儿头孢氨苄缓释剂(S-6437)的临床经验(作者译)
Jpn J Antibiot. 1978 Feb;31(2):59-71.
9
[Clinical experience with sustained release cefalexin (author's transl)].头孢氨苄缓释片的临床经验(作者译)
Jpn J Antibiot. 1977 Oct;30(10):793-801.
10
[Double-blind comparison of cefadroxil and cephalexin granules in the treatment of impetigo].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Jun;36(6):1443-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Oral Cephalexin-Clavulanic Acid, Cefuroxime, and Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid in the Management of Dental Infections: A Real-World, Retrospective, Electronic Medical Record-Based Study in India.口服头孢氨苄-克拉维酸、头孢呋辛和阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗牙齿感染的有效性:一项基于印度真实世界、回顾性电子病历的研究
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024 Mar;11(1):53-68. doi: 10.1007/s40801-023-00406-x. Epub 2023 Dec 18.