• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西索米星与妥布霉素的前瞻性双盲对照临床研究

Prospective double-blind controlled clinical study of sisomicin versus tobramycin.

作者信息

Schieker K R, Hofmann H F

出版信息

Pharmatherapeutica. 1981;2(8):499-503.

PMID:7019928
Abstract

A double-blind controlled trial was carried out to compare the efficacy of sisomicin and tobramycin in the treatment of 55 hospitalized patients with serious systemic infections, mostly intra-abdominal or soft-tissue infections. Each drug was administered intramuscularly or intravenously at a dosage of 2.5 to 4.0 mg/kg per day for between 5 and 21 days. At the end of treatment, 22 (79%) of 28 sisomicin-treated patients and 15 (72%) of 21 tobramycin-treated patients were assessed, on the basis of clinical and bacteriological response, as cured or partially cured. Sisomicin was superior in the treatment of Escherichia coli infections. Local tolerance to both drugs was good. The incidence of systemic adverse reactions was low, fewer cases occurring in the sisomicin treatment group than in the tobramycin treatment group.

摘要

进行了一项双盲对照试验,比较西索米星和妥布霉素治疗55例住院严重全身感染患者(主要为腹腔内或软组织感染)的疗效。每种药物均通过肌肉注射或静脉注射给药,剂量为每日2.5至4.0mg/kg,疗程为5至21天。治疗结束时,根据临床和细菌学反应评估,28例接受西索米星治疗的患者中有22例(79%)、21例接受妥布霉素治疗的患者中有15例(72%)被评定为治愈或部分治愈。西索米星在治疗大肠杆菌感染方面更具优势。两种药物的局部耐受性良好。全身不良反应的发生率较低,西索米星治疗组出现的病例比妥布霉素治疗组少。

相似文献

1
Prospective double-blind controlled clinical study of sisomicin versus tobramycin.西索米星与妥布霉素的前瞻性双盲对照临床研究
Pharmatherapeutica. 1981;2(8):499-503.
2
Comparative clinical trial of sisomicin and gentamicin in serious systemic gram-negative infections.西索米星与庆大霉素治疗严重全身性革兰氏阴性菌感染的对比临床试验。
Clin Ther. 1981;4(4):263-74.
3
Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of netilmicin and tobramycin in children with serious gram-negative infections.奈替米星与妥布霉素治疗儿童重症革兰阴性菌感染的临床疗效及安全性比较
Clin Ther. 1983;5(4):342-7.
4
Tobramycin in external eye disease: a double-masked study vs. gentamicin.
Curr Eye Res. 1981;1(5):259-66. doi: 10.3109/02713688108999445.
5
The aminoglycosides. Streptomycin, kanamycin, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, netilmicin, sisomicin.氨基糖苷类抗生素。链霉素、卡那霉素、庆大霉素、妥布霉素、阿米卡星、奈替米星、西索米星。
Mayo Clin Proc. 1983 Feb;58(2):99-102.
6
Comparison of four aminoglycoside antibiotics in the therapy of experimental E. coli meningitis.四种氨基糖苷类抗生素治疗实验性大肠杆菌脑膜炎的比较。
J Lab Clin Med. 1977 Apr;89(4):692-701.
7
Comparative evaluation of netilmicin-ticarcillin and tobramycin-ticarcillin in the treatment of serious systemic infections in elderly patients.奈替米星-替卡西林与妥布霉素-替卡西林治疗老年患者严重全身感染的比较评价
Clin Ther. 1984;7(1):112-20.
8
[Antibiotic-induced diseases. Aminoglycoside-induced renal lesions].[抗生素诱发的疾病。氨基糖苷类抗生素诱发的肾脏损害]
Minerva Med. 1978 Dec 15;69(61):4215-25.
9
[The clinical view of aminoglycoside antibiotics].
Adv Clin Pharmacol. 1978;15:119-26.
10
[Comparison of the antibacterial and therapeutic activity of tobramycin, sisomycin and gentamycin].妥布霉素、西索米星和庆大霉素的抗菌及治疗活性比较
Antibiotiki. 1978 Apr;23(4):333-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Sisomicin, netilmicin and dibekacin. A review of their antibacterial activity and therapeutic use.西索米星、奈替米星和地贝卡星。对其抗菌活性和治疗用途的综述。
Drugs. 1984 Jun;27(6):548-78. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198427060-00003.