Lorber R, Danzig M, Malfitan V A
Clin Ther. 1981;4(4):263-74.
One hundred one hospitalized patients with serious gram-negative infections were treated with either sisomicin, 1.0 mg/kg every eight hours, or gentamicin, 1.5 mg/kg every eight hours, in a multicenter study conducted at ten separate locations in the United States. Since the drugs were administered at different dosages, a blinded investigator was employed to assess treatment response, while an unblinded investigator was responsible for making dosage adjustments based on each patient's renal function and clinical response. Sixty of the patients (sisomicin, 29; gentamicin, 31) were treated for a sufficient period (average seven to ten days) to be valid for inclusion in the assessment of treatment efficacy; 81 were included in the safety analysis. Sisomicin was found to be superior to gentamicin in bacteriological response and slightly better than gentamicin in producing favorable clinical responses. Elimination of pathogens or a significant reduction in pathogen population was observed in 93% of the sisomicin-treated patients, compared with 67% in the gentamicin group (P = 0.06). The incidence of adverse effects in both treatment groups was low, with no significant differences in adverse reaction patterns.
在美国十个不同地点进行的一项多中心研究中,101名患有严重革兰氏阴性菌感染的住院患者接受了治疗,其中一组每八小时静脉注射1.0mg/kg西索米星,另一组每八小时静脉注射1.5mg/kg庆大霉素。由于两种药物的给药剂量不同,由一名不知情的研究人员评估治疗反应,而一名知情的研究人员负责根据每位患者的肾功能和临床反应调整剂量。60名患者(西索米星组29名,庆大霉素组31名)接受了足够疗程(平均7至10天)的治疗,可有效纳入治疗效果评估;81名患者纳入安全性分析。结果发现,西索米星在细菌学反应方面优于庆大霉素,在产生良好临床反应方面略优于庆大霉素。在接受西索米星治疗的患者中,93%观察到病原体清除或病原体数量显著减少,而庆大霉素组为67%(P=0.06)。两个治疗组的不良反应发生率都很低,不良反应模式没有显著差异。