Enany N M
Cleft Palate J. 1981 Oct;18(4):286-92.
Nine Caucasians with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate, treated with primary bone graft of the alveolus, were compared cephalometrically to a similar number of cases treated with soft tissue surgery but no primary osteoplasty. There were no significant differences between the two groups, except for the following: 1. The mandibular apical base was positioned more posteriorly in the bone-grafted group. 2. The ramal inclination angle was significantly smaller in the bone-grafted group. 3. The absolute depth of the mandible was significantly smaller in the bone-grafted group. Generally speaking, although these individuals were characterized by retrognathic faces, there was no significant difference in the anteroposterior and vertical growth of the middle face in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with the two different approaches. In contrast, there were significant differences between the two groups in mandibular depth and position, with mandibles in the bone-grafted group being shorter and more distally positioned. Maintenance of harmonious relationships of the dental bases was, however, achieved.
对9例接受牙槽突一期植骨治疗的单侧唇腭裂白人患者与相同数量仅接受软组织手术但未进行一期骨成形术的病例进行了头影测量比较。两组之间无显著差异,但以下情况除外:1. 植骨组下颌根尖基底位置更靠后。2. 植骨组升支倾斜角明显更小。3. 植骨组下颌绝对深度明显更小。一般来说,尽管这些个体表现为下颌后缩面容,但采用两种不同方法治疗的单侧唇腭裂患者中面部的前后向和垂直向生长无显著差异。相比之下,两组在下颌深度和位置上存在显著差异,植骨组的下颌更短且位置更靠远中。然而,牙基的和谐关系得以维持。