Pincus D J, Morrison D, Andrews C, Lawrence E, Sell S H, Wright P F
J Pediatr. 1982 Feb;100(2):197-201. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80634-3.
Two types of Hib vaccines were compared for efficacy and safety in 71 normal children in three age groups: 36 to 72 months, 15 to 18 months, and 6 to 8 months. One vaccine contained the Hib-specific capsular polysaccharide, PRP; the second vaccine contained PRP combined with pertussis vaccine, PRP-P. A third vaccine, DTP, was administered to a control group for each age. Anti-PRP antibody levels were greater after vaccination with PRP-P than after PRP in all three age groups. Immunoresponsiveness to both vaccines increased with age. A lower incidence of side effects was seen with both PRP (15%) and PRP-P (20%) than with DTP (56%). The results suggest that PRP-P is both well tolerated clinically and has greater immunogenicity than PRP.
在三个年龄组的71名正常儿童中比较了两种b型流感嗜血杆菌疫苗的有效性和安全性,这三个年龄组分别为36至72个月、15至18个月以及6至8个月。一种疫苗含有b型流感嗜血杆菌特异性荚膜多糖PRP;第二种疫苗含有PRP与百日咳疫苗的联合制剂PRP-P。对每个年龄组的一个对照组接种第三种疫苗——白喉-破伤风-百日咳三联疫苗(DTP)。在所有三个年龄组中,接种PRP-P疫苗后抗PRP抗体水平均高于接种PRP疫苗后。对两种疫苗的免疫反应性均随年龄增长而增强。PRP(15%)和PRP-P(20%)的副作用发生率均低于DTP(56%)。结果表明,PRP-P在临床上耐受性良好,且免疫原性比PRP更强。