Baylis P H, Gaskill M B, Robertson G L
Q J Med. 1981 Summer;50(199):345-58.
Vasopressin secretion was studied in a group of 18 patients with polydipsia (urine volume greater than 21/24 h) in whom nephrogenic diabetes insipidus had been excluded. Osmoregulation of vasopressin release was defined by hypertonic saline infusion, and three independent non-osmotic tests of vasopressin release were also applied. A wide spectrum of abnormalities in vasopressin secretion was observed. Four patients seem to have primary polydipsia, since they showed a normal response to osmotic stimulation, but non-osmotic vasopressin release was subnormal in two. The remaining 14 patients had cranial diabetes insipidus, as judged by subnormal or absent vasoprsssin responses to hypertonic saline infusion. Of these 14, five had undetectable vasopressin during osmotic stimulation, but each mounted a response to the non-osmotic stimuli; three of these had familial polyuria. Three further patients appeared to have isolated osmoreceptor defects, showing normal responses to non-osmotic stimuli but none to osmotic stress. Four patients with partial cranial diabetes insipidus, as judged by subnormal vasopressin response to osmotic stimuli, seemed to have normal osmoreceptor function but deficient vasopressin release. There was no correlation between the degree of vasopressin response to osmotic stimuli and the three non-osmotic tests of vasopressin release, and in particular vasopressin release should not replace osmotic tests to define cranial diabetes insipidus.
对一组18例烦渴患者(尿量大于24小时2.5升)进行了血管加压素分泌研究,这些患者已排除肾性尿崩症。通过静脉输注高渗盐水来确定血管加压素释放的渗透压调节,并且还应用了三项独立的血管加压素释放非渗透压测试。观察到血管加压素分泌存在广泛的异常情况。4例患者似乎患有原发性烦渴,因为他们对渗透压刺激表现出正常反应,但其中2例的非渗透压血管加压素释放低于正常水平。其余14例患者经判断患有中枢性尿崩症,因为他们对高渗盐水输注的血管加压素反应低于正常水平或无反应。在这14例患者中,5例在渗透压刺激期间检测不到血管加压素,但每例对非渗透压刺激均有反应;其中3例患有家族性多尿症。另外3例患者似乎存在孤立的渗透压感受器缺陷,对非渗透压刺激表现出正常反应,但对渗透压应激无反应。根据血管加压素对渗透压刺激的反应低于正常水平判断,4例患者患有部分中枢性尿崩症,他们似乎具有正常的渗透压感受器功能,但血管加压素释放不足。血管加压素对渗透压刺激的反应程度与三项血管加压素释放非渗透压测试之间没有相关性,特别是血管加压素释放不应替代渗透压测试来诊断中枢性尿崩症。