Burnside I G, Tobias H S, Bursill D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982 May;63(5):217-22.
Electromyographic biofeedback was compared with simple exercise therapy as to its effectiveness in improving foot-drop in 22 stroke patients. The study was designed to be a rigorous trial of biofeedback and the patients tested were aged and had stroke of long duration. One group of 11 patients underwent 6 weeks of exercise therapy 2 sessions per week for 15 minutes per session; the 2nd group of 11 patients underwent similar therapy with EMG feedback. All therapy was conducted by a research assistant who was not a trained therapist. The groups were assessed blind before treatment, after treatment and a 6-week follow-up. The significantly greater improvements in the biofeedback group in terms of muscle strength at the end of treatment were maintained at follow-up. On the range of movement and gait analysis measures, both groups showed some improvement after treatment. However, at follow-up this improvement had relapsed for the exercise group while for the biofeedback group it had been maintained. It is argued that controlled trials are possible in biofeedback and that using patients as their own controls is not justified in view of the present findings and the previously reported literature.
对22名中风患者,比较了肌电图生物反馈疗法与简单运动疗法改善足下垂的效果。该研究旨在对生物反馈疗法进行严格试验,所测试的患者年事已高且中风病程较长。一组11名患者接受为期6周的运动疗法,每周2次,每次15分钟;另一组11名患者接受类似疗法,但伴有肌电图反馈。所有治疗均由一名未经训练的研究助理进行。在治疗前、治疗后及6周随访时对两组患者进行盲法评估。治疗结束时,生物反馈组在肌肉力量方面有显著更大的改善,且在随访时得以维持。在运动范围和步态分析指标上,两组治疗后均有一定改善。然而,随访时运动组的这种改善出现了复发,而生物反馈组的改善得以维持。有人认为,生物反馈疗法进行对照试验是可行的,鉴于目前的研究结果和先前报道的文献,以患者自身作为对照是不合理的。