Suppr超能文献

即时获取计算机化病历对医生检查医嘱的影响:一项在急诊室进行的对照临床试验。

The effect of immediate access to a computerized medical record on physician test ordering: a controlled clinical trial in the emergency room.

作者信息

Wilson G A, McDonald C J, McCabe G P

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1982 Jul;72(7):698-702. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.7.698.

Abstract

We performed a randomized clinical trial of the effect of immediately printed summaries of a computerized medical record on physician test ordering rates in an Emergency Room setting. The computerized medical record contained medication history, the results of most diagnostic studies, an outpatient problem list, and inpatient and emergency room diagnoses. Physicians were presented with a printed summary of the patient's computerized record for study but not for control encounters. All other patient information was equally available to both kinds of encounters. All results were provided for one period of the study, designated T1. Due to a program error, summaries were printed without recent data during a period of the study, designated T2. Two-thirds of the visits were cared for by internists, one-third by surgeons. During T1, internists ordered an average of 3.2 tests, costing $34.91 for control visits, and 2.7 tests, costing $29.94 for study control visits (p less than .026). Surgeons also ordered fewer tests during study visits as compared to controls (1.32 vs 1.54) but the differences were not statistically significant. There was no significant effect on either medical or surgical test ordering during time period T2.

摘要

我们进行了一项随机临床试验,研究在急诊室环境中,即时打印的电子病历摘要对医生开检查单率的影响。电子病历包含用药史、大多数诊断检查结果、门诊问题清单以及住院和急诊诊断。在研究病例中,医生会收到患者电子病历的打印摘要以供参考,而对照病例则没有。两种病例均可平等获取所有其他患者信息。所有结果均针对研究的一个阶段(指定为T1)给出。由于程序错误,在研究的另一个阶段(指定为T2),打印的摘要中没有最新数据。三分之二的就诊由内科医生诊治,三分之一由外科医生诊治。在T1阶段,内科医生在对照就诊中平均开3.2项检查,费用为34.91美元,在研究就诊中平均开2.7项检查,费用为29.94美元(p<0.026)。与对照相比,外科医生在研究就诊中开出的检查也较少(1.32项对1.54项),但差异无统计学意义。在T2阶段,对内科或外科检查单的开具均无显著影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
A review of medical terminology standards and structured reporting.医学术语标准与结构化报告综述。
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2018 Jan;30(1):17-25. doi: 10.1177/1040638717738276. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
5
Effects of health information exchange adoption on ambulatory testing rates.健康信息交换采用对门诊检测率的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):1137-42. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001608. Epub 2013 May 22.
7
Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems.电子健康记录系统的优缺点。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47-55. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S12985. Epub 2011 May 11.
8
The use of count data models in biomedical informatics evaluation research.在生物医学信息学评估研究中使用计数数据模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):39-44. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000256. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

本文引用的文献

5
Alternatives in medical record formats.病历格式的替代方案。
Med Care. 1974 Oct;12(10):871-81. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197410000-00006.
6
Practice habits in a group of eight internists.八位内科实习医生的执业习惯。
Ann Intern Med. 1976 May;84(5):594-601. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-84-5-594.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验