Kiil J, Carvalho A, Saksø P, Nielsen H O
Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147(7):529-32.
Twenty patients with clinical signs of deep vein thrombosis of a duration not exceeding 72 hours, and with the condition confirmed phlebographically, were randomly allocated to one of two groups in a double-blind study. In group 1 the patients received urokinase in a low-dose regimen of 200 000 Ploug units during the first 24 hours, followed by infusion of heparin, 40 000 units daily during the next 5 days. Patients in group 2 received heparin only, 40 000 units daily for 6 days. The clinical course was assessed daily. When the infusion period was completed, the phlebography was repeated, and the results of the two examinations were compared with respect to extent of filling defects and the degree of non-filling of the deep veins. We found no superiority in the regimen consisting of urokinase preceding heparin infusion, compared with that of heparin infusion alone. Most of the patients improved clinically during the 6-day infusion period, but the degree of thrombosis, evaluated phlebographically, was unaltered or even deteriorated during the period in all patients except two. Overt bleeding was noted in 6 patients.
20例有深静脉血栓形成临床体征且病程不超过72小时、经静脉造影证实病情的患者,在一项双盲研究中被随机分配到两组中的一组。第1组患者在最初24小时接受20万普洛单位低剂量方案的尿激酶治疗,随后在接下来5天每天输注4万单位肝素。第2组患者仅接受肝素治疗,每天4万单位,共6天。每天评估临床病程。输注期结束后,重复静脉造影,并比较两次检查结果中充盈缺损的范围和深静脉未充盈的程度。我们发现,与单纯肝素输注方案相比,肝素输注前使用尿激酶的方案并无优势。大多数患者在6天的输注期内临床症状有所改善,但除2例患者外,所有患者经静脉造影评估的血栓形成程度在该期间未改变甚至恶化。6例患者出现明显出血。