Suppr超能文献

尿激酶或肝素用于治疗深静脉血栓形成患者?

Urokinase or heparin in the management of patients with deep vein thrombosis?

作者信息

Kiil J, Carvalho A, Saksø P, Nielsen H O

出版信息

Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147(7):529-32.

PMID:7048826
Abstract

Twenty patients with clinical signs of deep vein thrombosis of a duration not exceeding 72 hours, and with the condition confirmed phlebographically, were randomly allocated to one of two groups in a double-blind study. In group 1 the patients received urokinase in a low-dose regimen of 200 000 Ploug units during the first 24 hours, followed by infusion of heparin, 40 000 units daily during the next 5 days. Patients in group 2 received heparin only, 40 000 units daily for 6 days. The clinical course was assessed daily. When the infusion period was completed, the phlebography was repeated, and the results of the two examinations were compared with respect to extent of filling defects and the degree of non-filling of the deep veins. We found no superiority in the regimen consisting of urokinase preceding heparin infusion, compared with that of heparin infusion alone. Most of the patients improved clinically during the 6-day infusion period, but the degree of thrombosis, evaluated phlebographically, was unaltered or even deteriorated during the period in all patients except two. Overt bleeding was noted in 6 patients.

摘要

20例有深静脉血栓形成临床体征且病程不超过72小时、经静脉造影证实病情的患者,在一项双盲研究中被随机分配到两组中的一组。第1组患者在最初24小时接受20万普洛单位低剂量方案的尿激酶治疗,随后在接下来5天每天输注4万单位肝素。第2组患者仅接受肝素治疗,每天4万单位,共6天。每天评估临床病程。输注期结束后,重复静脉造影,并比较两次检查结果中充盈缺损的范围和深静脉未充盈的程度。我们发现,与单纯肝素输注方案相比,肝素输注前使用尿激酶的方案并无优势。大多数患者在6天的输注期内临床症状有所改善,但除2例患者外,所有患者经静脉造影评估的血栓形成程度在该期间未改变甚至恶化。6例患者出现明显出血。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验