McClure W
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1982 Spring;7(1):2-44. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7-1-2.
This paper seeks to clarify so-called competition strategies for medical care, and to present a more flexible approach for public policy to encourage competition. In so doing, it appears useful to divide a competition strategy into two parts: (1)a structurally sound market mode for the future medical delivery and financing system, and (2) a strategy to implement the chosen model. Policymakers may choose any model that satisfies that structural conditions of a sound market. After listing there principal conditions, this paper presents two distant market models that satisfy them in entirely different ways and a third model that combines the first two. Once a specific market model is chosen, policymakers may choose among a variety of ways to implement it. Some implementation strategies require coercive legislation, others rely more on persuasive leadership, pressures, and incentives. The paper points out that all of these strategies must address certain common action areas: it then proposes one implementation strategy in some detail and uses it to illustrate a way to address each of these area. Although it certainly is not the only possible strategy, the proposal would appear to be practical approach for implementing effective competition.
本文旨在阐明所谓的医疗保健竞争策略,并为鼓励竞争的公共政策提出一种更灵活的方法。在此过程中,将竞争策略分为两部分似乎很有用:(1)未来医疗服务和融资系统的结构健全的市场模式,以及(2)实施所选模式的策略。政策制定者可以选择任何满足健全市场结构条件的模式。在列出主要条件后,本文提出了两种截然不同的市场模式,它们以完全不同的方式满足这些条件,以及第三种结合了前两种模式的模式。一旦选择了特定的市场模式,政策制定者可以在多种实施方式中进行选择。一些实施策略需要强制性立法,其他策略则更多地依赖于有说服力的领导、压力和激励措施。本文指出,所有这些策略都必须涉及某些共同的行动领域:然后详细提出一种实施策略,并用它来说明解决每个领域的方法。虽然这肯定不是唯一可能的策略,但该提议似乎是实施有效竞争的切实可行的方法。