Braine H G, Stuart R K, Saral R, Lietman P S
Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Mar-Apr;4(2):586-92. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.2.586.
A combination of parenteral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and carbenicillin (TMP-SMZ-C) was compared with a gentamicin and carbenicillin combination (G-C) as empiric therapy for the febrile neutropenic patient with cancer in a prospective double-blind trial. Target plasma levels of TMP were achieved easily. When all trials were considered, TMP-SMZ-C was more effective (P less than or equal to 0.045) than G-C. When only proven infections were considered, the two regimens were equally effective. Adverse effects of both regimens were similar. Experience with infections due to individual organisms, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, was limited. General recommendations for use of TMP-SMZ-C in this patient population cannot be made until more comprehensive studies are done.
在一项前瞻性双盲试验中,将胃肠外注射甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与羧苄青霉素联合用药(TMP-SMZ-C)和庆大霉素与羧苄青霉素联合用药(G-C)作为癌症发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的经验性治疗进行了比较。TMP的目标血浆水平很容易达到。当考虑所有试验时,TMP-SMZ-C比G-C更有效(P小于或等于0.045)。当仅考虑已证实的感染时,两种治疗方案同样有效。两种治疗方案的不良反应相似。对于由个别微生物,特别是铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌引起的感染的经验有限。在进行更全面的研究之前,无法对该患者群体使用TMP-SMZ-C给出一般性建议。