Mayes A, Boddy J, Meudell P
Neurosci Lett. 1980 Jul;18(3):347-52. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(80)90309-2.
Six alcoholic amnesics were compared with 6 matched controls in a task involving visual presentation of words under 'learn', 'repeat' and 'passive' instructions whilst their EEG was recorded from the vertex. Although the amnesics' N2-P3 component to word stimuli was similar to that of controls, their word-elicited N1-P2 component was of greater amplitude and their EEG showed an overall reduction in power in the period immediately following word offset. The group difference for N1-P2 was similar in all instructional conditions, but the EEG power difference was greater in the learn condition. It was argued that the N1-P2 enhancement may reflect an attempt by the amnesics to compensate for an unspecified activational impairment indicated by their reduced post-word EEG power.
在一项任务中,研究人员将六名酒精性遗忘症患者与六名匹配的对照组进行了比较。该任务要求在“学习”“重复”和“被动”指令下对单词进行视觉呈现,同时从头顶记录他们的脑电图。尽管遗忘症患者对单词刺激的N2 - P3成分与对照组相似,但他们由单词引发的N1 - P2成分振幅更大,并且在单词消失后的即刻,他们的脑电图显示出功率总体下降。N1 - P2的组间差异在所有指令条件下都相似,但脑电图功率差异在学习条件下更大。有人认为,N1 - P2增强可能反映了遗忘症患者试图补偿其单词后脑电图功率降低所表明的未明确的激活损伤。