Manyari D E, Ko P, Gulamhusein S, Boughner D R, Kostuk W J, Klein G J
Chest. 1982 Jan;81(1):67-73. doi: 10.1378/chest.81.1.67.
Regular tachycardia with wide QRS complexes may be difficult to classify as supraventricular (SVT) or ventricular (VT) without electrophysiologic studies. We felt that hemodynamic differences between VT and SVT should allow their distinction by echocardiography. In this study, we utilized high speed M-mode echocardiography in the usual projections in eight patients during tachycardia. Two patients had spontaneous VT and three had spontaneous SVT with aberrant conduction. The remaining three were patients in sinus rhythm undergoing electrophysiologic studies in whom right ventricular (RV) pacing (induced VT), right atrial (RA) pacing (induced SVT) and sequential RV-RA pacing (induced VT with 1:1 retrograde conduction) were carried out. The echocardiographic parameters studied included: left ventricular internal dimensions, time during which the mitral valve remained open (MVOT), left ventricular ejection time (LVET) and pre-ejection period. We measured 20 consecutive beats and for each parameter defined its variability. During A-V dissociation (VT, RV pacing) there was always a striking beat-to-beat variability in the values of MVOT (68 percent to 129 percent) and in LVET (41 percent to 175 percent). In contrast, during A-V association (SVT, sequential RV-RA pacing, sinus rhythm) the maximal variability of MVOT and LVET was 22 percent and 12 percent, respectively. Variability during A-V dissociation could be explained by asynchronous timing of atrial systole. We conclude that echocardiography can readily identify atrioventricular dissociation, a feature heavily in favor of a diagnosis of VT.
在没有电生理研究的情况下,伴有宽QRS波群的持续性心动过速可能难以归类为室上性(SVT)或室性(VT)。我们认为VT和SVT之间的血流动力学差异应能通过超声心动图将它们区分开来。在本研究中,我们对8例心动过速患者在常规投照下使用了高速M型超声心动图。2例患者有自发性VT,3例有伴差异性传导的自发性SVT。其余3例为窦性心律患者,正在接受电生理研究,对其进行了右心室(RV)起搏(诱发VT)、右心房(RA)起搏(诱发SVT)以及序贯RV-RA起搏(诱发1:1逆向传导的VT)。所研究的超声心动图参数包括:左心室内径、二尖瓣开放持续时间(MVOT)、左心室射血时间(LVET)和射血前期。我们测量了连续20个心动周期,对每个参数确定其变异性。在房室分离(VT、RV起搏)期间,MVOT值(68%至129%)和LVET值(41%至175%)总是存在显著的逐搏变异性。相比之下,在房室关联(SVT、序贯RV-RA起搏、窦性心律)期间,MVOT和LVET的最大变异性分别为22%和12%。房室分离期间的变异性可由心房收缩的不同步时间来解释。我们得出结论,超声心动图能够轻易识别房室分离,这一特征强烈支持VT的诊断。